Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #16713

Re: Optimisation questions

Show all headers | View raw

Thanks for all the answers, x&8 looks like a good one for efficiency.

I also had another idea while sleeping - amazing how that helps :)  At 
program startup, maybe in another thread, I can build an array of all 
x/8, x%8 for x's that might occur, then just look up in this array 
instead of doing the division every time. I will try this today also.

Thanks

On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:44:25 -0500, James Kuyper wrote:
> On 02/04/2012 05:30 PM, Raj Pashwar wrote:
>> Hello :
>> 
>> My current program runs too slow. It uses x/8 and x%8 many times, where
>> x is an int in both cases.
>> 
>> I have replaced x/8 with x>>3, as this is faster (pretty sure).
>> However, I am not sure whether this is faster than x%8 : x-=(x>>3)<<3;
> 
> As a general rule, your compiler should generate exactly the same code
> for x/8 and x>>3, because they're required to have exactly the same
> behavior. If it doesn't, get a better one. What that code will be may be
> different on different machines, it might be called a division
> instruction on one machine, and a shift instruction on a different
> machine, but you can generally trust the compiler to know which one is
> faster. If it doesn't, get a better one.
> 
> 
>> Is this generally a good optimisation to use?
>> 
>> Also I've got a memory region that I constantly need to access, so I
>> would like it to be in cache. I know that I can use 'register' in
>> variable declarations, to speed up it's access.
> 
> That's unlikely to be the case; if putting it in a register would speed
> up, you can be reasonably sure the compiler already puts it in a
> register, even if you don't specifically tell it to do so. If it didn't
> put it in a register, it probably had a good reason for not doing so; in
> that case, if it paid attention to your "register" declaration, it could
> actually slow your program down. For precisely this reason, most
> compilers ignore the keyword "register", and the way the standard is
> written, this is perfectly acceptable behavior.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Optimisation questions Raj Pashwar <raj121190@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2012-02-04 22:30 +0000
  Re: Optimisation questions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 11:44 +1300
    Re: Optimisation questions Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-04 14:52 -0800
      Re: Optimisation questions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 11:55 +1300
      Re: Optimisation questions Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-21 18:41 +0200
  Re: Optimisation questions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-02-04 22:44 +0000
    Re: Optimisation questions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-02-04 23:41 +0000
  Re: Optimisation questions Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-04 17:51 -0500
  Re: Optimisation questions Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-04 14:52 -0800
  Re: Optimisation questions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-04 18:44 -0500
    Re: Optimisation questions Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-04 18:00 -0600
      Re: Optimisation questions James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-04 21:18 -0500
        Re: Optimisation questions Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-02-05 03:04 +0000
          Re: Optimisation questions Dann Corbit <dcorbit@connx.com> - 2012-02-06 09:40 -0800
            Re: Optimisation questions Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-02-06 18:51 +0000
            Re: Optimisation questions Markus Wichmann <nullplan@gmx.net> - 2012-02-07 14:19 +0100
              Re: Optimisation questions Dann Corbit <dcorbit@connx.com> - 2012-02-07 14:25 -0800
          Re: Optimisation questions Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-06 17:29 -0600
            Re: Optimisation questions Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-02-06 23:52 +0000
            Re: Optimisation questions pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-02-06 19:10 -0500
    Re: Optimisation questions Raj Pashwar <raj121190@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2012-02-05 10:51 +0000
      Re: Optimisation questions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-06 00:08 +1300
        Re: Optimisation questions Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-05 08:13 -0500
      Re: Optimisation questions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-02-05 11:33 +0000
      Re: Optimisation questions Zoltan Kocsi <zoltan@bendor.com.au> - 2012-02-05 23:24 +1100
        Re: Optimisation questions Raj Pashwar <raj121190@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2012-02-05 22:28 +0000
          Re: Optimisation questions Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-02-05 22:37 +0000
          Re: Optimisation questions Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-05 17:48 -0500
          Re: Optimisation questions Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-05 15:57 -0800
      Re: Optimisation questions "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-02-05 12:53 +0000
  Re: Optimisation questions Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-02-04 16:07 -0800
  Re: Optimisation questions "christian.bau" <christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-04 15:37 -0800
    Re: Optimisation questions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 04:26 -0800
      Re: Optimisation questions lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-02-07 10:56 -0500
  Re: Optimisation questions Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 04:29 -0800
  Re: Optimisation questions Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@prodigy.net> - 2012-02-05 23:24 -0800

csiph-web