Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #16409

Re: typecast function pointer

Show all headers | View raw

"Eric Sosman" <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> wrote in message 
news:jg0ui5$o9l$1@dont-email.me...
>     No, because `int' and `s_int32_t' are *not* different types.
> A typedef declaration does not create a new type; it just creates
> an additional name for an existing type.  Also, `signed int' and
> `int' are not different types, but just two different ways to
> name the same type.  All of `s_int32_t', `signed int', and `int'
> are different ways of naming one type, and all three aliases can
> be used interchangeably.[*],[**]

Thanks for comprehensive answers!

What can be the reason to declare a function returning 'signed int' instead 
of 'int' if those are all the same types? IMHO it only brings in confusion, 
as in my case.

Mark. 

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

typecast function pointer "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-28 08:15 -0500
  Re: typecast function pointer Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-01-28 08:52 -0500
    Re: typecast function pointer "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-29 16:47 -0500
      Re: typecast function pointer Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-30 10:56 +1300
      Re: typecast function pointer Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-29 14:27 -0800
        Re: typecast function pointer Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-01-30 00:14 +0000
          Re: typecast function pointer Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-29 21:05 -0800
      Re: typecast function pointer Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-01-29 18:07 -0500
        Re: typecast function pointer Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-29 21:06 -0800
  Re: typecast function pointer Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-28 14:08 +0000

csiph-web