Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #15661

Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels?

From Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels?
Date 2012-01-09 16:11 -0600
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jefong$a4q$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <20147768-1b78-4ac5-84e5-607c1d47c6a6@dp8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 09-Jan-12 14:25, Elmar wrote:
> a previous discussion in this group mentioned the problem that fork()
> is a resource bottleneck because it needs to (virtually) duplicate a
> process' memory space:
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c/browse_thread/thread/911978685974e041/bdd37113d7b43e0c
> ...
> Google didn't help much, so my hope was that one of you has heard of/
> encountered this problem, knows which kernels are affected, and when/
> how it was solved, maybe there is a configuration trick etc.?

Did you read that thread?  The answer is in there, and it has nothing to
do with the kernel versions; it's about whether vm overcommitment is
enabled (fast but unsafe) or disabled (safe but unfast).

S

-- 
Stephen Sprunk         "God does not play dice."  --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723         "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS        dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Elmar <elmar.krieger@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 12:25 -0800
  Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-10 09:41 +1300
  Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-09 21:32 +0000
    [OT] Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-01-09 22:12 +0000
      Re: [OT] Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-09 22:32 +0000
        Re: [OT] Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-10 11:56 +1300
  Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-09 16:11 -0600
    Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-09 22:30 +0000
      Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-09 17:20 -0600
        Re: [OT] fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2012-01-09 23:57 +0000
          Re: [OT] fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-10 00:22 +0000
            Re: [OT] fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-09 20:39 -0600
              Re: [OT] fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2012-01-09 19:43 -0800
                Re: [OT] fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-01-10 00:31 -0600
          Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Elmar <elmar.krieger@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 14:39 -0800
        Re: fork() 50 times slower on some Linux kernels? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-01-10 23:07 +0000

csiph-web