Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #968
| From | no.top.post@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware, alt.os.linux.slackware, alt.os.linux.debian |
| Subject | Re: HOW2 test a frame-buffer? |
| Date | 2012-01-06 08:15 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <je6aj6$gm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <je1ml9$3gs$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
In article <je1ml9$3gs$1@dont-email.me>, no.top.post@gmail.com wrote: OK, here's the elementary info, which I wanted:-- because the framebuffer is a 'live' file/device you can use file access to read/write it [probably] and see what it shows. -> cat <a file> > /dev/fb0 will write to the display, I tested in VT mode. Perhaps <video buffer overflow: error> could be an error, but for my test a 300KB file just <wrote pixels to the top 20% of the screen. My more advance question is below. > An application that I need to have on a HP-mini netbook, > needs a frame buffer. > > When I did: cd /dev; ./MAKEDEV -n -v fb > it showed : > udev active, devices will be created in /dev/.static/dev/ > create fb0 c 29 0 root:video 0660 > create fb1 c 29 1 root:video 0660 > create fb2 c 29 2 root:video 0660 > create fb3 c 29 3 root:video 0660 > create fb4 c 29 4 root:video 0660 > create fb5 c 29 5 root:video 0660 > create fb6 c 29 6 root:video 0660 > create fb7 c 29 7 root:video 0660 > > Because the app. still failed, I did: > ln -s /dev/.static/dev/fb0 /dev/fb0 > which made a difference: > the VT-display, just blanks. > > But I was able to 'key' to other VTs and > Ctrl/C, Ctrl/D ..to free up the VT, which I > had to re-login, after each test cycle. > > My slak13 PC shows some info for `fbset`; > but the netbook has got DebianEtch without any > utilities to test the frame-buffer, that I can find. > > How would I test the fb* facility independantly > of my application? > > == TIA. On my PC:slak13 which has the normal /dev/fb0 the above described test is good. On the HP:Win7:netbook with CF:Debian:Etch -> cat <file> > /dev/.static/dev/fb0 == <-bash: no such device: /dev/.static/dev/> And yet -> ls -l /dev/.static/dev/fb* shows all 8 of them. -> mknod /dev/fb0 c 29 0 -> ls -l /dev/fb0 == good -> cat <file> > /dev/fb0 == <-bash: no such device: /dev/.static/dev/> So I'm wondering why, although `ls -l` sees </dev/*/fb0>, apparently `bash` does not ? == TIA.
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
HOW2 test a frame-buffer? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-01-04 14:10 +0000
Re: HOW2 test a frame-buffer? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-01-06 08:15 +0000
Re: HOW2 test a frame-buffer? pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2012-01-06 08:57 +0000
Re (2): HOW2 test a frame-buffer? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-01-06 16:26 +0000
Re: HOW2 test a frame-buffer? "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2012-01-06 23:18 -0500
Re (2): HOW2 test a frame-buffer? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-01-08 05:35 +0000
Re (3): HOW2 test a frame-buffer? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-01-08 15:42 +0000
csiph-web