Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #12550

Re: would you consider this function const?

From Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: would you consider this function const?
Date 2011-12-15 13:32 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <jcdefm$669$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <jcctkm$i7j$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jccv7e$8if$1@dont-email.me> <jcd09b$umt$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jcd2dn$r0e$1@dont-email.me> <jcdbi9$ren$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/15/2011 12:42 PM, john wrote:
> [...]  I do not
> understand you comment that Volume cannot derive from Topology. I do not
> see a problem with doing it.

Nah...  Forget I mentioned it.  Do a const_cast.  Five years from now 
expect a maintenance nightmare.  If it doesn't materialize, consider 
yourself lucky.  If your program doesn't live that long, all the better.

V
-- 
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

would you consider this function const? john <gh14tq5@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-14 10:17 -0500
  Re: would you consider this function const? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-12-14 11:19 -0500
    Re: would you consider this function const? john <gh14tq5@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-15 08:10 -0500
      Re: would you consider this function const? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-12-15 08:21 -0500
        Re: would you consider this function const? john <gh14tq5@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-15 08:44 -0500
          Re: would you consider this function const? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-15 14:07 +0000
            Re: would you consider this function const? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-12-15 14:14 +0000
          Re: would you consider this function const? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-12-15 09:11 -0500
            Re: would you consider this function const? john <gh14tq5@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-15 09:30 -0500
              Re: would you consider this function const? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-12-15 10:06 -0500
                Re: would you consider this function const? john <gh14tq5@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-15 12:42 -0500
                Re: would you consider this function const? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-12-15 13:32 -0500
    Re: would you consider this function const? yatremblay@bel1lin202.(none) (Yannick Tremblay) - 2011-12-19 18:16 +0000
      Re: would you consider this function const? Tobias Müller <troplin@bluewin.ch> - 2011-12-19 19:05 +0000
        Re: would you consider this function const? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 14:36 -0800
          Re: would you consider this function const? Tobias Müller <troplin@bluewin.ch> - 2011-12-20 06:28 +0000
            Re: would you consider this function const? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-12-19 23:48 -0800

csiph-web