Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures |
| Date | 2011-11-24 11:56 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jalt02$2qo$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <0364ed85-8bd9-4b42-9c74-86c4dd34adec@c18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <jailn0$uef$1@dont-email.me> <4ecd426e$0$4149$6e1ede2f@read.cnntp.org> <4ECD5A78.3010008@verizon.net> <jakivl$mtn$1@news.albasani.net> |
On 11/23/2011 11:59 PM, Ark wrote: > > > On 11/23/2011 3:41 PM, James Kuyper wrote: ... >> The C standard does mandate the sizeof operator, and it can be used to >> create a program which, at run-time, will generate output like that >> which he's asking for; I said as much in a later part of my message >> which you snipped. >> >> The C standard does not mandate the existence of any feature that would >> produce such output at compile time. The only output that normally >> appears at compile time and is mandated by the C standard is diagnostic >> messages, the text of which is not specified by the standard, nor under >> the control of the developer - with the exception of the #error >> directive. However, the #error directive is executed during phase 4; >> sizeof expressions cannot be evaluated until phase 7, so the value of >> such expressions cannot appear in #error output. > Are you sure you are not mixing up sizeof type and sizeof object? Yes, I'm sure. Would you care to explain why you think I might be? "sizeof(type)" is standard feature of C. "sizeof expression" is another standard feature of C, essentially equivalent "sizeof(typeof(expression))", except that standard C doesn't have "typeof". "sizeof object" is not a feature of C, though "sizeof expression_referring_to_object" can be misinterpreted as having that meaning. -- James Kuyper
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Memory footprint of a structure of structures Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com> - 2011-11-23 03:00 -0800
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-23 06:33 -0500
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2011-11-23 19:58 +0100
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-23 15:41 -0500
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Ark <akhasin@macroexpressions.com> - 2011-11-23 23:59 -0500
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures "Philip Lantz" <prl@canterey.us> - 2011-11-23 22:01 -0800
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-24 11:56 -0500
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2011-11-24 10:06 +0100
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-24 12:00 -0500
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com> - 2011-11-25 03:01 -0800
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-25 12:52 +0000
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-25 13:29 +0000
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-25 15:06 -0500
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Ark <akhasin@macroexpressions.com> - 2011-11-27 00:41 -0500
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-11-23 17:37 +0000
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-11-23 22:46 +0100
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-11-23 22:55 +0100
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Ark <akhasin@macroexpressions.com> - 2011-11-24 00:04 -0500
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 00:39 -0800
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-11-24 10:34 +0000
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-24 12:18 +0000
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com> - 2011-11-24 07:11 -0800
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2011-11-25 22:08 +0000
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-26 11:37 +1300
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2011-11-27 23:20 +0000
Re: Memory footprint of a structure of structures Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-11-27 10:17 +0000
csiph-web