Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #13702

Re: A portable stack in C

From "Jo" <none@none.none>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: A portable stack in C
Date 2011-11-21 07:48 -0600
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <jadkq7$1fv$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <4ec53d42$0$1387$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <ja3gl3$h7q$1@dont-email.me> <636055c1-141d-49bf-a53c-3ab5d5e7bd68@y12g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <4ec62755$0$1375$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <b7eb034e-4e54-4881-a4c9-90f17cef8840@m7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Nick Keighley wrote:
> On Nov 18, 9:40 am, "io_x" <a...@b.c.invalid> wrote:
>> "Nick Keighley" <nick_keighley_nos...@hotmail.com> ha scritto nel
>> messaggionews:636055c1-141d-49bf-a53c-3ab5d5e7bd68@y12g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
>> On Nov 17, 5:35 pm, "BartC" <b...@freeuk.com> wrote:
>>> "io_x" <a...@b.c.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:4ec53d42$0$1387$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it...
>>>> "blm...@myrealbox.com" <blmblm.myreal...@gmail.com> ha scritto nel
>>>> messaggio
>>>> news:9ikohgF3p7U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> In article <4ec14700$0$1387$4fafb...@reader2.news.tin.it>,
>>>>> io_x <a...@b.c.invalid> wrote:
>
>>>>>> in the while the train go always more far from home
>
> <snip train gibberish>
>
>> [...] So io_x are you *actually* on a train or is it some
>> sort of metaphor?
> [...]
>> #it is not one metatphor
>
> so explain what you mean or shut up about the trai
>
>

You mean about how you suck so bad. It was never for you, idiot.


I was here 2 years ago. I put away the guitar, not that I was good at it.
I said, ("said") I will put music on hold.


I suck at playing guitar, but ain't you still here asking me about a 
train.


   yeah, the train and me, it's none of your fucking business.

 Don't you even dare engage me, because I have nothing better to do then 
to get you out of  my face.

>> Ritchie the Fat Controller and bit fields the grumpy carriages...
>>
>>>> lets call one programming language X
>>>> i thought only if instead of doing the traslation X -> x86 cpu
>>>> is it possible doing X -> C -> all cpu
>>>> without U.B.
>>
>> C as universal assembler. This is actually how a lot of langauges are
>> implemented (at least initially). C++ was a compiler that compiled
>> into C. the advantage of this approach is you [get] high portability
>> but a
>> slow compiler.
>>
>> #it depend what is the set of instructions you send to compiler
>> #if they are complex or easy
>
> no.
>
>> I've also heard it said C isn't a particularly good "universal
>> assmbler". Though I'm not entirely sure why. I think it isn't low
>> level enough to do some of the things needed. (I tried writing a
>> scheme (ie.lisp) interpreter in C and it was horrid C)
>>
>> #i don't know; i like on 32 bits unsigned, most importat
>> u32[operators]=u32, #call32[stack],
>
> is that C
>
>> #variables definition[in the stack], jumps32, clc, stc, push32,
>> pop32,
>> ret_XXbits
>> # esp for reserve memory in the stack and use it
>> #i think with that all could be easy
>> #where 32 means 32 bit
>
> that definitely isn't C. Did you read what I wrote?

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-14 17:54 +0100
  Re: A portable stack in C Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2011-11-14 20:55 -0800
    Re: A portable stack in C jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-15 09:22 +0100
      Re: A portable stack in C Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2011-11-15 09:00 +0000
        Re: A portable stack in C jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-15 11:26 +0100
      Re: A portable stack in C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-15 10:05 +0000
        Re: A portable stack in C jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-15 11:25 +0100
          Re: A portable stack in C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-15 11:08 +0000
          Re: A portable stack in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-15 11:45 +0000
            Re: A portable stack in C jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-15 12:57 +0100
              Re: A portable stack in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-15 12:39 +0000
                Re: A portable stack in C jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-11-15 14:26 +0100
                Re: A portable stack in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-15 15:31 +0000
                Re: A portable stack in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-15 12:53 -0800
                Re: A portable stack in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-15 21:15 +0000
                Re: A portable stack in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-15 14:29 -0800
                Re: A portable stack in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-15 22:59 +0000
                Re: A portable stack in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-15 17:30 -0500
                Re: A portable stack in C Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-11-15 22:33 +0000
                Re: A portable stack in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-15 15:07 -0800
                Re: A portable stack in C Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-11-15 22:37 +0000
                Re: A portable stack in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-15 23:01 +0000
              Re: A portable stack in C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-15 18:45 +0000
            Re: A portable stack in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-15 12:41 -0800
          Re: A portable stack in C Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2011-11-15 23:07 -0500
            Re: A portable stack in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-15 20:18 -0800
            Re: A portable stack in C Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-15 22:53 -0600
              Re: A portable stack in C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-16 12:00 +0000
                Re: A portable stack in C falk@rahul.net (Edward A. Falk) - 2011-11-16 16:08 +0000
              Re: A portable stack in C David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2012-01-19 02:41 -0500
      Re: A portable stack in C Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> - 2011-11-15 11:21 -0500
      Re: A portable stack in C Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2011-11-15 17:53 -0800
    Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-15 19:21 +0100
      Re: A portable stack in C Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2011-11-15 17:53 -0800
        Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-18 08:13 +0100
  Re: A portable stack in C Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-11-15 10:14 +0000
    Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-15 19:20 +0100
  Re: A portable stack in C Acid Washed China Blue Jeans <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-11-15 08:13 -0800
  Re: A portable stack in C Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-15 16:27 +0000
    Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-15 19:21 +0100
    Re: A portable stack in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-15 13:19 -0800
  Re: A portable stack in C blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-11-17 15:45 +0000
    Re: A portable stack in C John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2011-11-17 15:56 +0000
    Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-17 18:02 +0100
      Re: A portable stack in C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-17 17:35 +0000
        Re: A portable stack in C Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2011-11-17 18:45 +0100
        Re: A portable stack in C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-18 00:27 -0800
          Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-18 10:40 +0100
            Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-20 07:22 +0100
            Re: A portable stack in C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-21 00:38 -0800
              Re: A portable stack in C "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 03:44 -0600
                Re: A portable stack in C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-11-21 13:00 +0200
                Re: A portable stack in C "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 06:07 -0600
              Re: A portable stack in C "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 03:50 -0600
              Re: A portable stack in C "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 07:48 -0600
              Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-21 20:11 +0100
          Re: A portable stack in C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-18 12:47 +0000
          Re: A portable stack in C "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-18 23:31 -0600
      Re: A portable stack in C blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-11-18 14:45 +0000
        Re: A portable stack in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-18 10:14 -0500
        Re: A portable stack in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-18 12:20 -0800
          Re: A portable stack in C blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> - 2011-11-19 17:23 +0000
            Re: A portable stack in C Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-11-19 18:49 +0000
              Re: A portable stack in C "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-19 22:41 -0600
              Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-20 07:27 +0100
                Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-21 20:12 +0100
            Re: A portable stack in C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-11-20 07:50 +0100
          Re: A portable stack in C "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-21 01:24 -0600
            Re: A portable stack in C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-21 05:22 -0800
              Re: A portable stack in C "Jo" <none@none.none> - 2011-11-22 03:31 -0600
  Re: A portable stack in C 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-21 06:38 -0800

csiph-web