Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.laptops > #846
| From | mike <spamme9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.laptops |
| Subject | Re: Partitions... |
| Date | 2011-11-09 12:49 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j9ep0o$pqe$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <Xns9F96A7EC1E2EAaaaalifecom@130.133.4.11> <j9b5rl$5gq$1@dont-email.me> <Xns9F978A65E5C13aaaalifecom@130.133.4.11> <j9c4nf$vk9$1@dont-email.me> <j9enub$q0n$3@reader1.panix.com> |
the wharf rat wrote: > In article <j9c4nf$vk9$1@dont-email.me>, mike <spamme9@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes. BUT!!! >> If you partition the drive in such a manner that there's insufficient room >> on e: to backup c:, you're unable to backup locally. That's why I'm > > Backing up to the same drive is like hedging your investment by > buying bonds from the same company you have 50% of your stock portfolio > in. > > "Oh, the disc crashed, no problem, I'll just restore from backups, > hey, wait a minute..." > Or, you could have read my original post in which I said, "Copy the image to your off-computer archive to guard against complete hardware failure. " But why do that when you can shoot from the hip?
Back to comp.sys.laptops | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Partitions... JakeD <fgdfgdfg@ghghfgh.com> - 2011-11-07 16:33 +0000
Re: Partitions... mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 13:00 -0800
Re: Partitions... JakeD <fgdfgdfg@ghghfgh.com> - 2011-11-08 09:52 +0000
Re: Partitions... mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 04:04 -0800
Re: Partitions... JakeD <fgdfgdfg@ghghfgh.com> - 2011-11-08 13:39 +0000
Re: Partitions... BillW50 <BillW50@aol.kom> - 2011-11-08 08:15 -0600
Re: Partitions... "RnR" <rnrtexas@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 09:38 -0600
Re: Partitions... BillW50 <BillW50@aol.kom> - 2011-11-08 10:02 -0600
Re: Partitions... mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 12:50 -0800
Re: Partitions... wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2011-11-09 20:31 +0000
Re: Partitions... mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2011-11-09 12:49 -0800
Re: Partitions... wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2011-11-12 09:38 +0000
Re: Partitions... BillW50 <BillW50@aol.kom> - 2011-11-08 08:44 -0600
Re: Partitions... wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2011-11-09 20:27 +0000
Re: Partitions... Tazz <dmswaine@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 15:26 -0400
Re: Partitions... mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 12:21 -0800
Re: Partitions... Tazz <dmswaine@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 19:33 -0400
Re: Partitions... mike <spamme9@gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 17:32 -0800
Re: Partitions... wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2011-11-09 20:24 +0000
csiph-web