Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #12907

Re: newby question on C I/O

Show all headers | View raw

Eric Sosman wrote:

> On 11/7/2011 8:10 PM, analyst41@hotmail.com wrote:
>> On Nov 4, 7:50 pm, Eric Sosman<esos...@ieee-dot-org.invalid>  wrote:
>>> On 11/4/2011 6:07 PM, analys...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a file that looks like
>>>
>>>> Value Cost Special_Status
>>
>> OK I typed the code in.  The compiler complained about the character
>> field and I changed it to integer (1=yes, 0 = no).
> 
>      Sorry: My blunder.  I should have written just `costs[j]', not
> `&costs[j]'.
> 
>> #include<stdio.h>
>> #include<stdlib.h>
>>
>>         void getdat(float values[], float costs[], int statuses[], int
>> items) ;
>>         void main()
> 
>      Oh, Lordy, Lordy, Lordy, will you ever catch flak for this!
> 
>>[...]
>> I also put the number of rows in row 2 (not being able to read till EOF
>> in C and counting the number of rows read)
> 
>      Certainly you can do that, and it's easy.  But I couldn't read
> your Fortran-ized FORTRAN, so you've got to cut me some slack: I was
> only guessing at what your Fortroid code was doing.

It looks to me as if your Fortran knowledge may be sorely out of date, 
Eric. Lower-case keywords have been standard Fortran since 1990. Heck, 
FORTRAN didn't even have dynamic memory allocation!

You should come out of the stone age - it's pretty nice here in the 21st 
century :D

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 15:07 -0700
  Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-04 20:50 -0400
    Re: newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 18:57 -0700
    Re: newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-07 17:10 -0800
      Re: newby question on C I/O Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-08 14:47 +1300
      Re: newby question on C I/O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-08 01:52 +0000
      Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-07 20:56 -0500
        Re: newby question on C I/O Edward Rutherford <edward.p.rutherford79@REMOVETHIS.gmail.com> - 2011-11-08 20:27 +0000
          Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-08 20:48 -0500
          Re: newby question on C I/O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-09 11:12 +0000
            Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-09 07:02 -0500
              Re: newby question on C I/O Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-11-09 16:12 +0000
        Re: newby question on C I/O - SUCCESS "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-08 16:12 -0800
  Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-04 21:46 -0400
    Re: newby question on C I/O Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2011-11-05 06:52 +0000
      Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-05 04:13 -0700
      Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-05 08:16 -0400
        Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-05 09:21 -0400
      Re: newby question on C I/O Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-05 09:13 -0400
    Re: newby question on C I/O David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 02:39 -0500
      Re: newby question on C I/O James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 10:05 -0500
        Re: newby question on C I/O David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2012-01-19 02:40 -0500
  Re: newby question on C I/O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-06 21:23 +0000
  Re: newby question on C I/O "analyst41@hotmail.com" <analyst41@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-10 18:00 -0800
    Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-11 01:35 -0800
      Re: newby question on C I/O gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-11 11:26 +0000
        Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-11 04:41 -0800
          Re: newby question on C I/O gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-11 14:14 +0000
            Re: newby question on C I/O Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-11-11 07:02 -0800
              Re: newby question on C I/O gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-11-11 15:44 +0000

csiph-web