Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?

From	Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K?
Date	2014-10-11 13:55 -0700
Organization	Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
Message-ID	<j86j3a9veo7vimap6c992ejoudekim4bna@4ax.com> (permalink)
References	<1412553844.20683.YahooMailNeo@web181605.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <mailman.14665.1412713672.18130.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>That's really interesting.  I looked briefly at the page.  How does your
>python extension work with xywrite?  Does it manipulate xywrite
>documents or does it tie in at runtime with Xywrite somehow?  If so, how
>does it do this?  Crossing the divide into a 16-bit app is pretty
>impressive.

Actually, Microsoft made it pretty easy to call 32-bit DLLs in a 16-bit
process and vice versa.  That's why many of us were surprised when they did
not provide the same capability in the 32/64 transition.
-- 
Tim Roberts, timr@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-10-07 14:27 -0600
  Re: Python 3.4.1 on W2K? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2014-10-11 13:55 -0700

csiph-web