Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #10860
| From | "A" <a@a.a> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... |
| Date | 2011-10-15 16:22 +0200 |
| Organization | B.net Hrvatska d.o.o. |
| Message-ID | <j7c503$j0g$1@gregory.bnet.hr> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <j7a4rj$g9k$1@dont-email.me> <j7a5ce$13h$1@gregory.bnet.hr> <9frk0iFvblU1@mid.individual.net> <j7a6ip$3cr$1@gregory.bnet.hr> <9frlr7FvblU2@mid.individual.net> |
> *Please don't snip attributions, it is rude.* I'll ignore you if you do > it again. Sorry, don't have idea what you're talking about here. Just cutting out the relevant part for the answer. All newsreaders have in-reference-to header so it is groupped as it should be. >> How is a macro list thing more convenient than a function? Because in this particular case it would be more useful. I have overloaded function that calls something like this: - a block of always the same block of code here - something different - a different block of the same code here and it is repeated in overloaded functions over and over. if I make a simple change in one or the other block I have to copy-paste them in each overloaded function. maintaining this would be easier if this code is placed in a function or... a kind of macro like i asked for in above explanations. >> do with macros or templates or any other way except functions? > Why? You haven't provided any justification for this new construct. I am informing myself of other ways of doing things. I already explained I can do it with functions but in this particular case a macro thing would be way more practical. No solution fits purposes.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-10-14 21:25 +0200
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-10-14 22:08 +0200
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-10-14 22:16 +0200
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-15 09:22 +1300
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-10-14 22:36 +0200
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-15 09:53 +1300
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-10-15 16:22 +0200
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-10-15 16:54 +0000
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... Noah Roberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-10-14 14:07 -0700
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-10-15 07:33 +0000
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-10-14 22:18 +0200
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-10-14 23:01 +0200
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2011-10-14 17:31 -0400
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-10-15 16:13 +0200
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-10-15 17:54 +0200
Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code... Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2011-10-15 12:02 -0400
csiph-web