Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | behavior of || operator |
| Date | 2011-10-07 13:13 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <j6nc0d$dii$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
Hello,
#define ATTACH 1
#define DETACH 2
#define DIRECTION_INGRESS 1 /* Incoming */
#define DIRECTION_EGRESS 2 /* Outgoing */
if ((action != ATTACH) || (action != DETACH))
puts("invalid action");
if ((dir != DIRECTION_INGRESS) || (dir != DIRECTION_EGRESS))
puts("invalid direction");
I appears that condition within if() is verified for being TRUE or FALSE,
and it is sufficient to have just one operand of || operator to return TRUE
in order for the whole expression yield TRUE result.
For example, if action = 1, then (action != ATTACH) becomes FALSE, then
(action != DETACH) is evaluated and it will return TRUE, thus making the
statement within if() TRUE. And this is wrong behavior, given that I need to
have actoni be either 1 or 2.
To make it right, || must be replaced with &&.
Is my reasoing above correct and valid?
Thanks.
Mark.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
behavior of || operator "Mark" <mark_cruzNOTFORSPAM@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-07 13:13 -0400 Re: behavior of || operator James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-10-07 14:11 -0400 Re: behavior of || operator John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2011-10-07 18:47 +0000 Re: behavior of || operator Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-10-07 19:50 +0000 Re: behavior of || operator Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-10-08 13:58 -0700
csiph-web