Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #657
| From | ein <ein@no.spam> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC |
| Date | 2011-09-28 10:56 +0200 |
| Organization | ATMAN - ATM S.A. |
| Message-ID | <j5unfd$cvc$1@node2.news.atman.pl> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnj7o7h4.9bk.nobody@joseph.cosgroves.us> <88743cb9-53d5-49b3-82e7-914e5698f7f9@m37g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <slrnj7stof.830.nobody@joseph.cosgroves.us> <slrnj859a0.7hg.nobody@joseph.cosgroves.us> |
On 09/28/2011 06:40 AM, Kevin the Drummer wrote: > Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> wrote: >> David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> wrote: >>> In my experience, this problem is almost always due to bad cabling. >>> The most common problems are: >> >>> 2) Use of cable or connectors that are not rated for Gigabit ethernet. >> >> That's possible. > > I've been trying speed tests between various computers in my > house, isolating sections of cable, switches and NICs in the > process. I found 3 pieces of CAT5 cable in the process, one of > them 2m long and two others 6m long. All has been replaced with > CAT5e or CAT6. Can you precise? Do u have 1000Base-T or 1000Base-TX equipment? From my experience the 1000Base-T is more common. For this standard you can use Cat5 cable or higher, so it should not be a problem.
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-09-23 00:50 -0500
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-23 09:14 +0000
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-09-23 18:15 -0500
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-24 17:33 +0000
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-09-24 19:30 -0500
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC david <none@nospam.com> - 2011-09-25 11:48 +0000
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC ein <ein@no.spam> - 2011-09-27 23:33 +0200
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-27 21:58 +0000
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC ein <ein@no.spam> - 2011-09-28 10:50 +0200
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-09-24 14:28 -0700
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-09-24 19:34 -0500
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-09-27 23:40 -0500
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC ein <ein@no.spam> - 2011-09-28 10:56 +0200
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-09-29 23:56 -0500
Re: VERY SLOW Intel e1000 1GB NIC Kevin the Drummer <nobody@cosgroves.us> - 2011-09-24 19:40 -0500
csiph-web