Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #235591
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Question re postscript and pdf |
| Date | 2026-09-12 13:20 +0200 |
| Organization | Tebibyte_Retro_Gaming |
| Message-ID | <j5pfnmxmk.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | <dl7bnmxdr4.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <1180rto$2smu7$1@dont-email.me> <1182cum$3d9ma$1@dont-email.me> <slrn11a9vvv.3j0.${send-direct-email-to-news1021-at-jusme-dot-com-i@vm46.home.jusme.com> <118388h$3jqcq$5@dont-email.me> |
On 2026-09-12 12:07, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2026-09-12, Ian wrote: > >> On 2026-09-12, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 15:24:23 +0300, magardner2010 wrote: >>> >>>> To convert arbitrary postscript into a PDF, you need to rewrite the >>>> postscript to only use the non Turing-complete subset allowed in >>>> pdf, which I could see running into the halting problem and other >>>> fun stuff. >>> >>> Adobe had a product called “Distiller” which did this. You ran a >>> custom wrapper program on a PostScript interpreter, which I think >>> intercepted all the actual rendering calls and output corresponding >>> PDF objects instead. >>> >>>> The big one I know is that PDF is not Turing complete, while PS is. >>>> You don't want your printer running infinite loops or memory bombs >>>> or similar. A malicious postscript document doesn't need a buggy >>>> postscript interpreter to do it's dirty work, a malicious pdf needs >>>> to cause the interpreter to misbehave to do any damage. >>> >>> Basically, no variables, and no loops or other control constructs. So >>> there is a one-to-one correspondence between objects in the page >>> definition and objects on the page rendition. >> >> ...then some idiot decided to allow javascript in PDF > > This being Adobe, I guess we're lucky they didn't push for e.g. wide use > of Shockwave Flash as part of PDF or something... or that you don't need > a Pantone™®© license to see colors... > > I can imagine it: "oh sorry your document made the printer run out of > toner because your Pantone White background requires a Pantone license > so it printed as a black page"... > > (Cf. <https://merveilles.town/@prahou/117216842053638207> for Adobe > Photoshop) I had a printing system failure the other day, and after some minutes a page printed fully in black. I think the root of the problem was that /etc/hosts file was empty. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question re postscript and pdf "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-10 19:57 +0200
Re: Question re postscript and pdf usenet@spuddy.org (Stephen Harris) - 2026-09-11 08:09 -0400
Re: Question re postscript and pdf "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-11 14:44 +0200
Re: Question re postscript and pdf magardner2010 <magardner2010@gmail.com> - 2026-09-11 15:24 +0300
Re: Question re postscript and pdf "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-11 14:42 +0200
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-12 02:21 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Ian <${send-direct-email-to-news1021-at-jusme-dot-com-if-you-must}@jusme.com> - 2026-09-12 07:32 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 11:07 +0100
Re: Question re postscript and pdf "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-12 13:20 +0200
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 12:52 +0100
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-13 08:16 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-13 13:42 +0200
Re: Question re postscript and pdf James Dow Allen <user4353@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-09-13 13:03 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-09-13 07:33 -0700
Re: Question re postscript and pdf John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-09-13 14:50 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-13 19:09 +0200
Re: Question re postscript and pdf antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-09-14 16:22 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-15 10:41 +0100
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-09-15 07:41 -0700
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 00:23 +0100
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-15 23:25 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2026-09-15 20:07 -0700
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-16 04:17 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:41 +0100
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-09-16 08:02 -0700
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2026-09-16 14:41 -0700
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-17 01:56 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-17 10:27 +0100
About OO vs LO "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-16 09:19 +0200
Re: About OO vs LO Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-16 07:48 +0000
Re: About OO vs LO "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-16 11:57 +0200
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-09-16 07:55 -0700
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-16 16:22 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-17 01:57 +0000
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-18 17:35 -0400
Re: Question re postscript and pdf Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-12 10:59 +0100
Re: Question re postscript and pdf antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-09-14 16:08 +0000
csiph-web