Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #10390

Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD

From Jeff Flinn <TriumphSprint2000@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD
Date 2011-09-22 09:44 -0400
Organization GC
Message-ID <j5fe49$j61$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <abab1ddd-c3ce-451b-b417-17b783cebb66@u19g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <d3e693ec-d847-4d50-8724-80a7c3aac5fd@h9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <4e7ae0ba$0$2844$7b1e8fa0@news.nbl.fi> <12bd85f5-4971-4b5f-8fb9-1018c1102eb7@et6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Stuart Redmann wrote:
> Stuart Redmann wrote:

...
> 
> I find myself wishing for some way to tell the comiler that some
> template parameter should be of some class type. The only way to
> document this is to put in some comment in the template's description.
> 
> Regards,
> Stuart

see boost type_traits, static_assert, and [dis/en]able_if libs and 
utilities.

Jeff

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD "persres@googlemail.com" <persres@gmail.com> - 2011-09-20 09:09 -0700
  Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-09-20 13:01 -0400
  Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-20 19:40 +0000
  Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-09-21 21:13 +0100
  Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> - 2011-09-21 23:45 -0700
    Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-09-22 07:16 +0000
      Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> - 2011-09-22 04:28 -0700
        Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-22 13:12 +0000
          Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> - 2011-09-22 09:08 -0700
            Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD "vincent.L" <vinceworld@gmail.com> - 2011-09-22 09:41 -0700
            Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-23 14:17 +0000
        Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Jeff Flinn <TriumphSprint2000@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-22 09:44 -0400
    Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Werner <werasm@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 00:14 -0700
  Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-09-22 12:47 -0700
  Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Erik Engheim <ordovician.cenozoic@mac.com> - 2011-09-25 21:00 +0200
    Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-27 18:47 +0000
      Re: C++ design/over desiging : stl style vs OOPS, OOAD "persres@googlemail.com" <persres@gmail.com> - 2011-10-21 04:28 -0700

csiph-web