Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.unix.programmer > #1208

Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets

From ittium <ittium@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.unix.programmer
Subject Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets
Date 2011-09-04 22:55 +0530
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <j40cak$gnt$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Group,
I have a small doubt. In case of non-blocking socket when send calls (on 
TCP sockets) returns, is it correct to assume that byte equal to return 
value of send call, have been sent and acknowledged or the bytes are 
only copied to send buffer and send returns.
thanks
Ittium

Back to comp.unix.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets ittium <ittium@gmail.com> - 2011-09-04 22:55 +0530
  Re: Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-09-04 14:07 -0400
  Re: Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-09-04 15:33 -0700
    Re: Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> - 2011-09-05 01:59 -0700
      Re: Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2011-09-05 13:05 +0100
      Re: Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-09-06 10:06 -0700
      Re: Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-09-07 02:49 +0100
      Re: Acknowledgement of sent bytes in non-blocking sockets Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> - 2011-09-07 18:28 +0000

csiph-web