Re: Debugger Recommendation

From	jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: Debugger Recommendation
Date	2011-08-29 23:00 +0200
Organization	lccwin
Message-ID	<j3gulo$mqg$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <j3ghn8$ekc$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1r40eko4dh4jz$.dlg@localhost.localdomain> <9c28u4Fq7jU2@mid.individual.net> <j3gu74$lb9$2@speranza.aioe.org> <9c2conFq7jU3@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Le 29/08/11 22:56, Ian Collins a écrit :
> On 08/30/11 08:52 AM, jacob navia wrote:
>> Le 29/08/11 21:51, Ian Collins a écrit :
>>> On 08/30/11 07:37 AM, Waldek M. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm asking because I've been using gdb for years and I haven't seen
>>>> anything better than this. It's also free, it's available
>>>> everywhere on Linux and it just works.
>>>> True, for GUI users, it may suck. But not because it's a bad
>>>> debugger, only.. it has no GUI, and third party GUIs are not
>>>> state-of-art.
>>>
>>> I guess those who use Eclipse or NetBeans would disagree with you about
>>> the state of the art!
>>>
>>
>> STATE OF THE ART!!!
>>
>> GDB STATE OF THE ART!!!
>>
>> Its interface hasn't changed at least since 1990.
>
> I was referring to the IDEs, not the debugger.
>
> Dressing mutton as lamb is part of an IDE designer's job!
>
No. I wrote a debugger complete with GUI for the lcc-win
system and I did not use any underlying gdb or other debugger.

 > Dressing mutton as lamb is part of an IDE designer's job!

That's exactly what many "ide" designers think, and that is
why the "ide"s of linux SUCK so much. They are completely USELESS.

An IDE must IMPROVE the command line programs.

Thread

Debugger Recommendation Joseph Hesse <joeh@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 09:40 -0500
  Re: Debugger Recommendation Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-29 11:01 -0400
  Re: Debugger Recommendation jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-29 19:19 +0200
    Re: Debugger Recommendation "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-08-29 21:37 +0200
      Re: Debugger Recommendation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-30 07:51 +1200
        Re: Debugger Recommendation jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-29 22:52 +0200
          Re: Debugger Recommendation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-30 08:56 +1200
            Re: Debugger Recommendation jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-29 23:00 +0200
              Re: Debugger Recommendation Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-30 09:21 +1200
              Re: Debugger Recommendation Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-30 04:58 +0100
        Re: Debugger Recommendation "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-08-31 21:45 +0200
      Re: Debugger Recommendation jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-29 22:51 +0200
        Re: Debugger Recommendation "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-08-31 21:11 +0200
          Re: Debugger Recommendation jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-31 22:17 +0200
            Re: Debugger Recommendation "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-09-01 07:26 +0200
  Re: Debugger Recommendation Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-29 22:02 -0700
    Re: Debugger Recommendation jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-30 11:09 +0200
      Re: Debugger Recommendation Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-30 05:26 -0700
        Re: Debugger Recommendation Oliver Jackson <chexmofo@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-30 08:25 -0700
          Re: Debugger Recommendation Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-30 10:34 -0700

csiph-web