Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #2976

Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year

From "A" <a@a.a>
Newsgroups comp.lang.php
Subject Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year
Date 2011-08-28 17:15 +0200
Organization B.net Hrvatska d.o.o.
Message-ID <j3dm57$2jp$1@gregory.bnet.hr> (permalink)
References <d3511025-608d-4369-9ba8-23875c9b555d@h9g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <j399e9$5sq$1@gregory.bnet.hr> <b314741f-e8cb-4d8c-92fc-1706b70d5ab9@x14g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <dd473ba9-84c7-44fc-ada8-f59babadcd45@s35g2000prm.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


mktime is more like a port of 32bit c++ version of mktime which functions 
has the same valid range.
but in c++ there is also mktime64 for ages which i haven't seen in php.

so there is nothing bonehead... it's just how it is made to work. accept it 
or find some alternative how to do it. 

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year BKDotCom <kent.brad@gmail.com> - 2011-08-26 12:56 -0700
  Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-08-27 01:14 +0200
    Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year BKDotCom <kent.brad@gmail.com> - 2011-08-27 07:54 -0700
      Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year BKDotCom <kent.brad@gmail.com> - 2011-08-27 11:05 -0700
        Re: mktime 2-digit vs 4-digit year "A" <a@a.a> - 2011-08-28 17:15 +0200

csiph-web