Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno |
| Date | 2011-08-13 17:45 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j26rbp$p11$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <lnty9m5htr.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <0.06274cbd79e04c20808d.20110813012700BST.87ei0qjgvf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <lnpqka5cc1.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <0.83adf5802e654f78a515.20110813143800BST.87d3g9ig93.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <lnzkjd403q.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
On 8/13/2011 2:50 PM, Keith Thompson wrote:
> [...]
> I think you're assuming that this program:
>
> #include<errno.h>
> #include<stdio.h>
> int main(void){}
>
> is strictly conforming. Of course it *should* be, but I'm arguing that
> the reservation of the identifier EOF by both<stdio.h> and<errno.h>
> creates an unintentional loophole, implying that it isn't. It depends
> on the implementation-defined choice of whether<errno.h> defines EOF.
7.1.2p4: "[...] However, if an identifier is declared or defined
in more than one header, the second and subsequent associated headers
may be included after the initial reference to the identifier."
Assuming "initial reference" also covers the header's declaration
or definition, then both <stdio.h> and <errno.h> can be #include'd in
the same translation unit, and in either order. Either must tolerate
the possible declaration of EOF by the other.
--
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Random thought -- EOF and errno Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-08-12 12:04 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-12 12:27 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 00:12 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-12 16:30 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 01:27 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-12 18:28 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 14:38 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-13 11:50 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-13 17:45 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-13 18:04 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 22:53 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-13 17:57 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-13 21:06 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-13 18:39 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-09-04 12:59 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-12 20:51 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-13 05:55 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 14:49 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-08-15 15:02 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-15 12:18 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-15 21:54 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-16 04:21 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-08-15 12:56 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-12 18:37 +0000
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-13 06:00 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-08-15 15:05 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-15 12:14 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno gordonb.gl0ml@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-08-16 04:31 -0500
csiph-web