Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno |
| Date | 2011-08-12 12:27 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <j23kdn$d9i$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <uKmdnfF9KuyE0tjTnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@bestweb.net> |
On 08/12/2011 12:04 PM, Kenneth Brody wrote: > A stray thought wandered into my head this morning... > > Given that 7.5p4 reserves macros that begin with E+digit or E+capital-letter > for error codes, what allows the Standard to also define EOF in a manner > unrelated to <errno.h>? (Aside from "duh, it's the Standard, and it can do > whatever it likes", that is.) Those macros are reserved for use by the implementation; EOF is #defined by the implementation; there's no conflict. In principle, EOF could even be a valid errno value.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Random thought -- EOF and errno Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-08-12 12:04 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-12 12:27 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 00:12 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-12 16:30 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 01:27 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-12 18:28 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 14:38 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-13 11:50 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-13 17:45 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-13 18:04 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 22:53 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-13 17:57 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-13 21:06 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-13 18:39 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-09-04 12:59 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-12 20:51 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-13 05:55 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-13 14:49 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-08-15 15:02 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-15 12:18 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-08-15 21:54 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-16 04:21 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-08-15 12:56 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-08-12 18:37 +0000
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-13 06:00 +0100
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-08-15 15:05 -0400
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-15 12:14 -0700
Re: Random thought -- EOF and errno gordonb.gl0ml@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2011-08-16 04:31 -0500
csiph-web