Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 |
| Date | 2011-07-30 23:03 +0200 |
| Organization | lccwin |
| Message-ID | <j11rig$1m3$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4e31aac3$0$15659$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> |
Le 28/07/11 20:32, io_x a écrit :
> Are you scare for what could happen 2-8?
No, I am not a citizen of the U.S.A and I do not live there.
That's why I am not scared. I would be if I lived there tough.
> what do they say repubblicans?
> where is the problem republicans-Obama?
>
The problem with debts is that you have to pay them one day.
Republicans have increased enormously the debts of the U.S.A.
during the last decade. Their strategy was twofold:
1) Increase spending.
2) Decrease revenues.
They increased spending in very important things like a war
in Iraq, a war in Afghanistan, and many other necessary investments
for the future.
They decreased revenues by exempting the billionaires and most big
corporations from paying taxes. For instance, General Electric
doesn't pay any taxes in the U.S.A.
Now, the debts have piled up and somebody has to pay them.
Republicans say that the debts should be paid by the poor.
As we all know, the poor are lazy, unwashed and dirty, so it is
normal that they pay the bills.
Democrats make a show as if they would disagree, and there is a lot
of drama going on. Basically however, democrats agree with all the
republicans policies. For instance, they continued the Bush era
tax cuts, an essential pillar of the deficit making.
What will happen?
At the last minute, both parties will agree that:
1) No new taxes should be decided for the poor billionaires
(No new revenues for the treasury)
2) The middle and lower classes (specially the lower ones)
should be burdened with all the effort of paying the bills.
This is because Americans have the best democracy money can buy.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-07-28 20:32 +0200
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-07-28 20:55 +0000
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2011-07-28 22:03 +0000
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-07-28 22:06 +0000
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2011-07-29 12:43 +0200
Re: USA Economy 2-8-2011 Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-30 05:15 -0700
Re: USA Economy 2-8-2011 Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@prodigy.net> - 2011-07-30 13:22 -0700
Re: USA Economy 2-8-2011 Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> - 2011-07-31 18:03 -0700
[OT] Date formats (was: USA Economy 2-8-2011) Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-01 13:56 +0100
Re: [OT] Date formats Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2011-08-01 15:25 +0200
Re: [OT] Date formats Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-01 14:32 +0100
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 Uno <Uno@example.invalid> - 2011-07-29 22:29 -0600
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-07-30 09:16 +0200
Re: USA Economy 2-8-2011 Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@prodigy.net> - 2011-07-30 13:42 -0700
Re: USA Economy 2-8-2011 gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-07-30 21:26 +0000
Re: USA Economy 2-8-2011 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-07-31 16:28 +0200
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-07-30 23:03 +0200
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-07-31 12:03 +0200
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-08-01 08:13 +0200
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-08-01 20:53 +0200
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-08-01 12:31 -0700
Re: [OT] USA Economy 2-8-2011 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-31 12:20 -0700
csiph-web