Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #3800
| From | Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? |
| Date | 2011-07-19 10:56 +0000 |
| Organization | Steven M. Christensen and Associates, Inc and MathTensor, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <j03ntk$a16$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
Mathematica will not allow you to prove that 1 == 0. It says False! Perhaps you, a human, would wish to deduce something opposite, from results that are contrary to other conventions or expectation. But still, Mathematica knows what's what here. And even that 2 + 2 == 7 is False. On 7/18/11 6:13 AM, slawek wrote: > > ...Mathematica uses a different convention. By default, assumes that numbers > such as 1.4 or 2.0 are inaccurate. It is even worse, because though a == b > is True, then N [a] and N [b] are not the same. Hence we can prove that 1 == > 0, or if you prefer that 2 +2 == 7 . > > It is a feature, but in my opinion it may leads to serious bugs. > > slawek > > > -- Murray Eisenberg murray@math.umass.edu Mathematics & Statistics Dept. Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H) University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W) 710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801 Amherst, MA 01003-9305
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu> - 2011-07-19 10:56 +0000
csiph-web