Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #7835
| From | "Johannes Schaub (litb)" <schaub.johannes@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: removing constness of a true const |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.c++ |
| Date | 2011-07-15 15:02 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <ivpdnr$okd$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <1e55c267-2789-498c-a5a1-f56e499336e5@z12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.c++
siddhu wrote: > I guess removing constness of a true const( I guess it is also called > bitwise const ) using const_cast is undefined behavior. Can you > please give an example of a true const and may be a sample code which > exhibits undefined behavior by removing constness of a true const. Some folks here mentioned literals like double or int literals. But those are not const, and const cannot meaningfully applied to them. What "const" means is that the stored value of an object does not change from one to another value. Changing the object may change the stored value to something else. "const" prevents such changes to the object. A value in and of itself does not convey a meaning of "const". Hence, in C++, non-class and non-array rvalues cannot be const qualified. That makes a great deal of sense, because they are not objects. It should be mentioned that the C++ Standard does not know a strict distinction between "value" and "object". In my text above, I used "value" in the sense of "the abstract meaning designated by an object's value representation", as defined by 3.9p4 (sadly that definition of "value" isn't used consistently throughout the spec or draft).
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
removing constness of a true const siddhu <siddharth.sng@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 08:07 -0700
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-14 11:55 -0400
Re: removing constness of a true const siddhu <siddharth.sng@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 09:25 -0700
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-14 16:18 -0400
Re: removing constness of a true const "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-07-15 01:18 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-15 08:17 -0400
Re: removing constness of a true const "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-07-15 18:04 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-16 08:36 +1200
Re: removing constness of a true const "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-07-16 02:00 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-07-15 16:08 -0500
Re: removing constness of a true const Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-16 09:30 +1200
Re: removing constness of a true const "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-07-14 19:05 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const siddhu <siddharth.sng@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 12:05 -0700
Re: removing constness of a true const "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-14 23:33 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-14 17:46 -0400
Re: removing constness of a true const "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-16 08:32 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const "Johannes Schaub (litb)" <schaub.johannes@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-15 15:02 +0200
Re: removing constness of a true const Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-15 09:54 -0400
csiph-web