Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #3618
| From | AES <siegman@stanford.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: How to write a "proper" math document |
| Date | 2011-07-09 11:32 +0000 |
| Organization | Steven M. Christensen and Associates, Inc and MathTensor, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <iv9e8t$d6q$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <201107041044.GAA02461@smc.vnet.net> <iuukk8$epi$1@smc.vnet.net> <15944200.6757.1309943765495.JavaMail.root@m06> <iv45b8$es8$1@smc.vnet.net> <iv6gqo$s5p$1@smc.vnet.net> |
In article <iv6gqo$s5p$1@smc.vnet.net>, Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > We need > > the same kind of thought given to active and dynamic documents as Edward > > Tufte has given to data graphics. > > Yes, I agree entirely here. I think that Tufte is hard to match. Have to say that, back sometime around the early 1990s, which I was voluntarily teaching a small course for EE students in preparing demos and graphic displays on the Mac using QuickBasic (or was it Real Basic?) I bought Tufte to see what it might have to tell me the graphic of data and computed results -- and decided it had nothing really useful to say, was as over-hyped as it was empty of meaningful content, and discarded it. Maybe I should look again . . .
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: How to write a "proper" math document "McHale, Paul" <Paul.McHale@excelitas.com> - 2011-07-05 09:13 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-07-06 09:39 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-07-06 09:40 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-07 11:31 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-07-08 08:57 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Peltio <peltio@twilight.zone> - 2011-07-08 09:09 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-09 11:34 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document "David Park" <djmpark@comcast.net> - 2011-07-07 11:29 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-07-08 08:55 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-08 08:58 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-07-09 11:32 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-07-09 11:32 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-07-09 11:44 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl> - 2011-07-12 10:59 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl> - 2011-07-13 07:13 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-13 07:17 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu> - 2011-07-14 09:28 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl> - 2011-07-15 01:24 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document "McHale, Paul" <Paul.McHale@excelitas.com> - 2011-07-07 11:33 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document "McHale, Paul" <Paul.McHale@excelitas.com> - 2011-07-07 11:38 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document AES <siegman@stanford.edu> - 2011-07-08 09:02 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document Armand Tamzarian <mike.honeychurch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-08 09:06 +0000
Re: How to write a "proper" math document JUN <noeckel@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 09:43 +0000
csiph-web