Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #7485
| From | Anonymous <anonymous@no.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? |
| Date | 2011-07-05 20:46 +0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <iuvm6d$85n$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <iutd2n$d9m$1@dont-email.me> <iuuk44$i31$1@dont-email.me> <iuurn9$sck$1@dont-email.me> <iuv17c$uog$1@dont-email.me> <iuvj59$s8m$1@dont-email.me> |
Leo Equinox Gaspard ha scritto: > I *did* try it. > And, as soon as I change it to reflect what I mean - this means removing > the > FAIL_CONSTRUCTOR case and adding a InitFailed() -, everything works OK. BTW > the NO_INIT_CALL looks useless to me, so I removed it. > And, for the -D switch, thanks, but I knew it. > Please also note that InitFailed doesn't has any use, but it could be > used in > case of raw pointer manipulation. > The code (you only have to play with FAIL_INIT) : This is what I meant in my previous post. IMHO it should be ok.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Anonymous <anonymous@no.net> - 2011-07-02 00:19 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-07-02 00:37 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Anonymous <anonymous@no.net> - 2011-07-02 01:19 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-07-02 08:50 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Anonymous <anonymous@no.net> - 2011-07-02 10:50 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-07-02 11:17 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Anonymous <anonymous@no.net> - 2011-07-02 11:25 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Anonymous <anonymous@no.net> - 2011-07-02 11:31 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-07-02 12:00 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Werner <werasm@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 01:10 -0700
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Anonymous <anonymous@no.net> - 2011-07-04 20:41 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 21:35 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 23:59 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-07-05 11:09 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-07-05 13:15 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-07-05 14:51 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-07-05 19:55 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Anonymous <anonymous@no.net> - 2011-07-05 20:46 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-07-05 21:23 +0200
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Werner <werasm@gmail.com> - 2011-07-06 00:14 -0700
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? Virchanza <virtual@lavabit.com> - 2011-07-05 14:58 -0700
Re: Virtual functions in constructors. Is it possible? "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-07-06 01:28 +0200
csiph-web