Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #7461
| From | "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: please give me the coding please... |
| Date | 2011-07-04 23:51 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <iuu58o$88d$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <d9a2a528-4ae0-489a-8bd1-db5cd1492d41@b39g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <ium94j$tgr$1@dont-email.me> <3850bb16-0711-43bf-818c-aa229a06ad16@q14g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <iuokot$tbh$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Qi wrote: > On 2011-7-2 15:33, JetQi Tan wrote: >> how?i really need help here,i dont understand what my teacher tought > > If you are sure you listened to your teacher carefully during > the course, ask your school to fire your teacher then. And teaching is fun too. What is "teaching"? Can one teach? "teaching" is oxymoronic. One can only present and perhaps facilitate and enable, but for learning to occur, someone has to be seeking knowledge. Isn't it quite arrogant for someone to call themselves "a teacher"? Shouldn't the focus be on learning, for why focus on something that can't be done (if it can't be done, i.e.). This person is a good self-learner, to which I am deeply greatful to my hero, the well-reknown Jack Handey (http://iamkraze.com/my-favorite-jack-handey-quotes-deep-thoughts). People have various preferred or required modes of learning: allusion to the many times recited "visual, auditory, tactile" learning modes. Most people have varying degrees of all of those. There is more than just those though. There is the inductive and deductive (reasoning) and the associated top-down/bottom-up, and, general-to-specific/specific-to-general "approaches". "Language lawyers" surely must be bottom-up reasoners.while designers surely seem to top-down reasoners. The detail first or the big picture? Pick up the big pile of trash first or sweep up the crumbs first? The methods can be had as "approaches" to solution development. When little a priori knowledge exists, a bottom-up approach may not only be prudent, but may be the only way to procede, while a top-down approach may very well be prudent in the opposite case. Anyone wanna bet that I can't work-in the term "language lawyer" in every USENET post I make? (RHETORICAL and JUST KIDDING!!).
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
please give me the coding please... JetQi Tan <jetqi1011@gmail.com> - 2011-07-01 19:04 -0700
Re: please give me the coding please... "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-02 00:08 -0500
Re: please give me the coding please... JetQi Tan <jetqi1011@gmail.com> - 2011-07-02 00:33 -0700
Re: please give me the coding please... Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2011-07-02 12:03 +0200
Re: please give me the coding please... Qi <no@no.com> - 2011-07-03 10:36 +0800
Re: please give me the coding please... "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-04 23:51 -0500
Re: please give me the coding please... "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-04 23:34 -0500
Re: please give me the coding please... Puppet_Sock <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-02 13:09 -0700
Re: please give me the coding please... jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-07-02 21:32 +0000
csiph-web