Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #380
| From | Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." |
| Date | 2011-07-02 13:59 +0200 |
| Organization | ATMAN - ATM S.A. |
| Message-ID | <iun14p$v3c$1@node2.news.atman.pl> (permalink) |
| References | <3c50710c-c220-4697-91a7-49b6dc304782@r33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <4E08D22D.7EB751FB@web.de> <9eceabc4-b9fb-49e3-a917-6986ee00a33e@d26g2000prn.googlegroups.com> |
>> C++11 aside (the latest draft is not public and I have no idea what it >> says), > > C++0x, 29.3 p13. In draft n3242, the exact text is: > "Implementations should make atomic stores visible to atomic loads > within a reasonable amount of time." > If you have the time, this point somehow interests me a lot. To start: does it apply to relaxed only? The main question: Does it apply to release (and acquire/consume)? (I am ignoring other orderings on purpose, as irrelevant for release/acquire, or consume, pair) What I am basically wondering about, is how to release a lock (or anything else blocking another thread) in a way that assures it is done 'now' [1]; I care more about the standard - > how to write code < - than how it is on architecture X - > how to implement a compiler <. Edek [1] I do have a notion of relativity of now. I mean 'without any costly delay'
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-27 20:55 +0200
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-01 04:06 -0700
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-07-01 17:35 +0200
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-01 15:23 -0700
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-07-02 10:18 +0200
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-05 15:10 -0700
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-07-02 13:59 +0200
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonableamount of time." Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-07-05 10:12 +0200
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonableamount of time." Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-07-05 11:36 +0200
csiph-web