Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Alexander Bartolich <alexander.bartolich@gmx.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: packing a "variable length struct" |
| Date | 2011-06-27 20:09 +0000 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <iuao2e$4i3$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <739a8aed-13cb-4cb4-9ac0-0e360bcef865@bl1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <iu9nv7$te5$1@news.albasani.net> <iu9ovn$un7$1@dont-email.me> <iuah9s$e0u$1@dont-email.me> |
Shao Miller wrote:
> On 6/27/2011 07:19, James Kuyper wrote:
>> On 06/27/2011 07:01 AM, Alexander Bartolich wrote:
>> ...
>>> pointer, i.e. declare
>>>
>>> typedef struct
>>> {
>>> A_t meta;
>>> double centres[1];
>>> } B_t;
>>>
>>> then allocate sufficient memory and access the array "centres" beyond
>>> its bounds.
>>
>> You should note, however, that while this technique works with most
>> (?all) C compilers, any program that uses it has undefined behavior.
>
> Bounds checking as undefined behaviour? Say it ain't so!
Imagine a platform where the address range reachable by index/offset
registers is smaller than the address range covered by size_t.
Exhibit 1: Intel 8086, running in 16-bit mode, memory model "Huge".
Exhibit 2: The Atmel AVR, a contemporary 8-bit microcontroller.
The compiler can generate much more efficient code if it assumes that
the array will not be accessed beyond its bounds.
--
host -t mx moderators.isc.org
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
packing a "variable length struct" fishboy <j.j.fishbat@gmail.com> - 2011-06-27 02:46 -0700
Re: packing a "variable length struct" Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-27 22:48 +1200
Re: packing a "variable length struct" Alexander Bartolich <alexander.bartolich@gmx.at> - 2011-06-27 11:01 +0000
Re: packing a "variable length struct" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-06-27 07:19 -0400
Re: packing a "variable length struct" Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-27 14:12 -0400
Re: packing a "variable length struct" Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-27 15:08 -0400
Re: packing a "variable length struct" Alexander Bartolich <alexander.bartolich@gmx.at> - 2011-06-27 20:09 +0000
Re: packing a "variable length struct" Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-27 17:45 -0400
Re: packing a "variable length struct" Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-06-27 07:24 -0400
Re: packing a "variable length struct" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-27 09:06 -0700
Re: packing a "variable length struct" BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-27 15:35 -0700
Re: packing a "variable length struct" fishboy <j.j.fishbat@gmail.com> - 2011-06-30 23:54 -0700
csiph-web