Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6694

Re: More support for Paul's array terminology

From Michael Tsang <miklcct@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: More support for Paul's array terminology
Followup-To comp.lang.c++
Date 2011-06-13 21:31 +0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <it53gf$prj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <it534m$o6a$1@dont-email.me>

Followups directed to: comp.lang.c++

Show all headers | View raw

Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet wrote:

> To be fair, it just occurred to me, as an example, that we do say "pointer
> to array of pointers" and not "pointer to first element in an array of
> pointers".
> 
> And now I will probably have to kill this thread...
> 
> Thanks to Ian Collins for the 'K' key tip for Thunderbird!
> 
> 
> Cheers & hth.,
> 
> - Alf
> 

Are you saying that if x is a "pointer to array of pointer of T", then x is to 
be declared as:

T *(*x)[5];

??

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More support for Paul's array terminology "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 15:35 +0200
  Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Michael Tsang <miklcct@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 21:31 +0800
    Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-06-13 17:31 +0200
    Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Johannes Schaub (litb)" <schaub.johannes@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-13 18:12 +0200
      Re: More support for Paul's array terminology SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 01:51 -0700
        Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-06-14 11:46 -0400
  Re: More support for Paul's array terminology gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-06-14 00:19 -0700
    Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-14 18:42 +0100
      Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-14 22:22 +0100
        Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 13:44 +0100
          Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 16:59 +0100
            Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 17:29 +0100
              Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 20:06 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 22:13 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-16 23:05 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-17 17:35 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-17 18:41 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-17 19:28 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-17 19:40 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-17 19:51 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-17 20:23 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-06-18 06:17 -0700
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 15:14 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 16:35 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 17:50 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 18:07 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 18:09 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 18:16 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 19:22 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 20:34 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-06-18 12:51 -0700
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 21:09 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-06-17 09:55 +0200
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-17 10:44 +0100
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2011-06-18 20:32 +0200
                Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-18 20:05 +0100
      Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-06-14 14:24 -0700
        Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-06-14 23:07 +0100
          Re: More support for Paul's array terminology "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-14 23:33 +0100
          Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-06-14 15:40 -0700
            Re: More support for Paul's array terminology Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-06-15 09:44 -0700

csiph-web