Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6573

Re: accessing to web service from C++

From Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: accessing to web service from C++
Date 2011-06-10 13:57 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <istluu$qrb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <4def4ace$0$2831$7b1e8fa0@news.nbl.fi> <isnr9q$s6m$1@dont-email.me> <m239jjhlsd.fsf@sherm.shermpendley.com> <isqdrf$fbr$1@dont-email.me> <m2tybxiz21.fsf@sherm.shermpendley.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/10/2011 9:41 AM, Sherm Pendley wrote:
> Victor Bazarov<v.bazarov@comcast.invalid>  writes:
>
>> Why should he/she care about any other OS or platform?
>
> Why shouldn't he? Plans change, platforms evolve. Simple case in point:
> Apple, a few years ago, changed from PPC to Intel chips. Devs whose code
> assumed a particular endianness - perhaps because they didn't care about
> "portability" - were in a world of hurt during the transition.

<shrug> I don't see the parallel.  Difference in endianness is a known 
problem.  Because "endianness" is a universal concept.  Differences in 
accessing a web service do not exist because very few OSes actually 
support such an access.  So, a cross-platform (or, rather, a 
platform-independent) solution involving endianness is necessary.  A 
platform-independent solution for accessing a web service is not possible.

>> For "accessing to web service"?  Boost?  On *all* OSes?  Really?
>> *All* of them?  Really?
>
> No - not really. I used Boost as an example of a portable library that
> could be legitimately referred to here in the general case.

In the general case you can.  The OP wasn't talking about a general 
case.  At least that's what I gathered when I recommended asking in the 
OS newsgroup.  What was so wrong about it that you can't stop and think 
about your objection and simply see that your efforts are off-target?

> The rest, the notion that it applies specifically to the OPs question
> about web services for instance, comes from your own hyperactive imag-
> ination, for which I'm not responsible.

<sigh> My "hyperactive imagination"...  Listen to yourself.  So, it's my 
hyperactive imagination that insists on suggesting the OS newsgroup for 
inquiries about web service access, right?  And for all other 
OS-specific frameworks or libraries.  And you keep bringing up an 
IRRELEVANT portable library that doesn't address the OP's issue in the 
lightest.  And scorn me for not agreeing with you...  I give up.  It's 
like arguing with a child, and I have more than enough of that at home.

V
-- 
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

accessing to web service from C++ softwareEngineer <ovNOSPAM@NOSPAMlibero.it> - 2011-06-07 11:48 +0200
  Re: accessing to web service from C++ Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-06-07 08:36 -0400
    Re: accessing to web service from C++ Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-06-08 10:11 +0000
      Re: accessing to web service from C++ Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-06-08 08:52 -0400
        Re: accessing to web service from C++ Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-06-08 18:03 +0000
          Re: accessing to web service from C++ Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-06-10 01:23 -0700
            Re: accessing to web service from C++ legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2011-06-10 17:25 +0000
        Re: accessing to web service from C++ Sherm Pendley <sherm.pendley@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 20:48 -0400
          Re: accessing to web service from C++ Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-06-09 08:21 -0400
            Re: accessing to web service from C++ Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-09 15:57 +0200
              Re: accessing to web service from C++ Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-06-09 10:32 -0400
            Re: accessing to web service from C++ Sherm Pendley <sherm.pendley@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 09:41 -0400
              Re: accessing to web service from C++ Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-06-10 13:57 -0400
                Re: accessing to web service from C++ Sherm Pendley <sherm.pendley@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 17:00 -0400
  Re: accessing to web service from C++ drew@furrfu.invalid (Drew Lawson) - 2011-06-08 14:06 +0000
    Re: accessing to web service from C++ Donkey Hottie <donkey@fredriksson.dy.fi> - 2011-06-12 18:15 +0300
      Re: accessing to web service from C++ Christopher <cpisz@austin.rr.com> - 2011-06-13 06:53 -0700
  Re: accessing to web service from C++ Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 18:36 -0700
  Re: accessing to web service from C++ legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2011-06-10 17:20 +0000

csiph-web