Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6177
| From | Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | unions |
| Date | 2011-06-04 05:26 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <iscfn1$keo$8@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
There are some things, that as I learned to program, I learned them,
decided they suck and would never use them, and then put them away.
unions are one of these things (static was another and complex #define
yet another).
But I took this employment exam this week and 10% of the questions
involved unions. As I understood unions, union sub-objects just step on
each other in binary in the allocated space where they exist (talk about
a snake pit for potential bugs). Am I missing something about them? I
started to have deep doubts about what I thought I knew.
union {
double x;
char a[10];
} myunion;
myunion.a[0] = 'A';
myunion.a[1] = 'A';
myunion.a[2] = 'A';
myunion.a[3] = 'A';
std::cout << myunion.x << std::end
is going to spit out some binary translation of a double with 4 bytes of
65 dec, whatever that is.
Ruben
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
unions Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-06-04 05:26 +0000
Re: unions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-04 17:38 +1200
Re: unions Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-06-04 05:45 +0000
Re: unions Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-04 18:04 +1200
Re: unions Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-06-04 06:13 +0000
Re: unions Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-06-04 04:54 -0700
Re: unions Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 19:59 +0200
Re: unions Vaclav Haisman <v.haisman@sh.cvut.cz> - 2011-06-04 20:13 +0200
Re: unions Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-06-04 22:34 +0200
Re: unions Vaclav Haisman <v.haisman@sh.cvut.cz> - 2011-06-05 07:29 +0200
Re: unions Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-06-09 09:19 +0000
Re: unions Keith <kbelder@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 11:17 -0700
Re: unions Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-06-09 14:29 -0400
Re: unions Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 13:16 +0200
csiph-web