Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "J. J. Farrell" <jjf@bcs.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation |
| Date | 2011-06-03 01:52 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <is9b8f$bhm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <jqqcu69ug4eo4fd1b97qj75engnaogon2b@4ax.com> <8eSdnQguna-r8nvQnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@bestweb.net> <87lixltrmp.fsf@blp.benpfaff.org> <AK-dnZWx3_nfOnrQnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@bestweb.net> |
Kenneth Brody wrote: > On 6/1/2011 12:59 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> Kenneth Brody<kenbrody@spamcop.net> writes: >> [massive snippage below] >> >>> On 6/1/2011 12:45 PM, Datesfat Chicks wrote: >>>> c_main.c(71): error C2064: term does not evaluate to a function taking >>>> 305 arguments >> >>> In other words, it's a function call, with "mystring" (including the >>> quotes) being the function name/pointer. Obviously, a string literal >>> is not a function name/pointer. >> >> Any idea why the compiler thinks there should be (or, perhaps, >> that there are) 305 arguments? > > Perhaps it's a bug in the compiler? A feature surely? It's issuing a diagnostic, which is all that's required of it. The diagnostic is even correct, just not particularly helpful.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 12:45 -0400
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Billy Mays <noway@nohow.com> - 2011-06-01 12:49 -0400
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 13:19 -0400
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-06-01 09:50 -0700
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-06-01 12:56 -0400
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-06-01 09:59 -0700
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-06-02 11:07 -0400
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-06-02 11:22 -0400
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-02 11:25 -0500
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-06-02 09:02 -0700
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-06-03 10:49 -0400
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation "J. J. Farrell" <jjf@bcs.org.uk> - 2011-06-03 01:52 +0100
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-02 18:06 -0700
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-01 10:07 -0700
Re: Unexpected Difficulty with String Constant Concatenation Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2011-06-01 13:14 -0500
csiph-web