Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c, comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Types in C |
| Date | 2011-06-02 22:49 +0200 |
| Organization | lccwin |
| Message-ID | <is8t0m$9cl$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <irbo6c$ul$1@speranza.aioe.org> <is0vfg$vqg$1@dont-email.me> <is14v9$f62$1@speranza.aioe.org> <is8snh$qa5$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Le 02/06/11 22:44, Marcin Grzegorczyk a écrit : > jacob navia wrote: >> Le 30/05/11 22:42, Marcin Grzegorczyk a écrit : >>> jacob navia wrote: >> After reading N1439 I would tend to agree with what it says but >> where should go the void type? >> >> It is void an object type? > > Yes, void belongs to object types, even if it might seem weird at first. > Well, YES... It seems weird to me, I wonder how the readers of the tutorial will react. In any case I will update the tutorial to reflect the current thinking of the committee. > Consider how the void type is used: > * As a function return type. Function return types are object types. > * As a function parameter type (with special constraints). Function > parameter types are object types, too. > * As a pointed-to type. There are pointers to object types and pointers > to function types; `void*` is compatible only with the former. > > [snip] >> The problem is that N1429 is difficult to read because it only >> refers to what should be patched and doesn't display the patched >> text. > > I brought N1429 only for the rationale. (The latest C1X draft is N1569 / > N1570 (without / with diff marks, respectively).) OK. Thanks. jacob
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Types in C jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-05-22 21:29 +0200
Re: Types in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-22 12:48 -0700
Re: Types in C Marcin Grzegorczyk <mgrzegor@poczta.onet.pl> - 2011-05-30 22:42 +0200
Re: Types in C Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 17:45 -0500
Re: Types in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-31 08:47 -0700
Re: Types in C Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-31 13:54 -0400
Re: Types in C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-31 22:38 -0700
Re: Types in C Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 07:22 -0500
Re: Types in C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-06-01 12:13 -0700
Re: Types in C jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-05-31 00:16 +0200
Re: Types in C Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-30 18:30 -0500
Re: Types in C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-31 22:43 -0700
Re: Types in C Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 07:41 -0500
Re: Types in C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-06-01 12:23 -0700
Re: Types in C Marcin Grzegorczyk <mgrzegor@poczta.onet.pl> - 2011-06-02 22:44 +0200
Re: Types in C jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-06-02 22:49 +0200
Re: Types in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-06-02 15:26 -0700
csiph-web