Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.dcom.telecom > #539
| From | Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.dcom.telecom |
| Subject | Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] |
| Date | 2011-04-29 15:50 -0500 |
| Organization | The Telecom Digest |
| Message-ID | <ipf8ba$7o7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <Pine.NEB.4.64.1104270853400.2033@panix5.panix.com> <cc6e57e8-37d7-4f76-9bb3-be7c0856bdb3@dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <jonjr6h5fnk3rgf4kc64j27d010q1ksjs8@4ax.com> <20110429000058.19922.qmail@gal.iecc.com> <eYidnWLhaK20xCfQnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@megapath.net> |
On 4/29/2011 1:22 AM, Hal Murray wrote: > I've been on the DNC list since it started. > > I get one or two a week. They are mostly for local businesses > like carpet cleaning and air duct cleaning. They call again and > again and again. I recognize them. > > I got one from from Heather at Account Services this morning. > > I get occasional mortgage or credit card stuff. Likewise. But at least with VoIP I can set up a filter, so that the next time they call from that number, it gets a "The number you have dialed has been disconnected" (or busy, or hangup). If I was energetic enough, I could make a custom intercept recording tailored to spammers. Dave
Back to comp.dcom.telecom | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> - 2011-04-27 09:04 -0400
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Sam Spade <sam@coldmail.com> - 2011-04-28 09:07 -0700
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] "\(PeteCresswell\)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:41 -0400
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] richgr@panix.com (Rich Greenberg) - 2011-04-29 17:00 +0000
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] "Geoffrey Welsh" <gwelsh@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-05 17:56 -0400
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> - 2011-05-09 21:30 -0700
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] David Clayton <dcstarbox-usenet@yahoo.com.au> - 2011-04-29 16:02 +1000
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> - 2011-04-29 19:09 -0400
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Lisa or Jeff <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> - 2011-04-28 11:23 -0700
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] "\(PeteCresswell\)" <x@y.Invalid> - 2011-04-28 17:43 -0400
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Fred Atkinson <fatkinson.remove-this@and-this-too.mishmash.com> - 2011-04-28 17:59 -0600
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] hal-usenet@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Hal Murray) - 2011-04-29 01:22 -0500
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2011-04-29 15:50 -0500
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Jim Haynes <jhaynes@cavern.uark.edu> - 2011-04-29 10:37 -0500
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Fred Atkinson <fatkinson.remove-this@and-this-too.mishmash.com> - 2011-04-29 09:27 -0600
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Pete Cresswell <x@y.Invalid.telecom-digest.org> - 2011-04-29 20:18 -0400
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] Stephen <stephen_hope@xyzworld.com> - 2011-04-29 14:13 +0100
Re: Looks like "fake caller ID" laws are about to get a boost [telecom] T <kd1s.nospam@cox.nospam.net> - 2011-04-29 19:10 -0400
csiph-web