Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #1975
| From | Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: MachinePrecision vs. Arbitrary Precision |
| Date | 2011-04-29 11:30 +0000 |
| Organization | Steven M. Christensen and Associates, Inc and MathTensor, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <ipe7h9$qt8$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ipbfs7$ad3$1@smc.vnet.net> |
Bill Rowe <readnews@sbcglobal.net> writes:
> On 4/27/11 at 5:39 AM, worthless.trash.junk@gmail.com (Rafael Dunn)
> wrote:
>
>>In:=
>>N[Sin[Exp[100]]]
>>N[Sin[Exp[100]], 1]
>>N[Sin[Exp[100]], 11]
>
>>Out:=
>>-0.999105
>>0.1
>>0.14219812366
>
>>I realize that N[exp] = N[exp, MachinePrecision]. This indicates
>>when N[] is asked to calculate to MachinePrecision,
>
> More specifically, this asks hardware to do the required computation.
>
>>it produces an incorrect result in this example.
>
> That is due to the limitations of floating point arithmetic as
> implemented in hardware. The actual result you get will vary
> according to what hardware is being used.
To emphasize that this is the result from hardware here is a program in
the C programming language:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
int main(void)
{
printf("%g\n", sin(exp(100)));
return 0;
}
And here is its output:
-0.999105
Scott
--
Scott Hemphill hemphill@alumni.caltech.edu
"This isn't flying. This is falling, with style." -- Buzz Lightyear
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: MachinePrecision vs. Arbitrary Precision Bill Rowe <readnews@sbcglobal.net> - 2011-04-28 10:34 +0000 Re: MachinePrecision vs. Arbitrary Precision Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> - 2011-04-29 11:30 +0000
csiph-web