Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #32757
| From | John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@personalprojects.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Beginner's question. |
| Date | 2021-08-08 15:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <inaqk1F6qunU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <sekffo$l3s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <slrnsh03fs.e41.jj@iridium.wf32df> |
On 2021-08-08 1:01 p.m., Jim Jackson wrote: > On 2021-08-06, Jane <J@home.com> wrote: >> I'm not actually a beginner but I'm sure plenty who are have come across >> this problem many times...and I cannot find an explanation anywhere. >> >> After installing packages with software manager, some open up >> immediately, others are accompanied by an icon but many just seem to >> disappear. They are installed but there appears to be no way to run >> them. I have tried terminal and package manager to no avail. [snip] > Don't you have some sort of applications/software menu system in mint? > If so after an application gets installed, then it will insert an entry > in that menu. Only for GUI applications. Command line applications will not have a menu entry and will need to be launched in a terminal. You will need to know the command name(s) for that, and there is not necessarily a correlation to the package name. ImageMagick is an example of that. It is purely command line but no command of that name is installed. It is made up of several commands such as 'convert', 'display', 'montage', and others. So I can see how the OP might think certain newly installed command line programs would "just seem to disappear" since there is neither an icon nor a command line program of the same name. But they are there under other names. Also, some administrative programs (typically on the command line, too) are only in root's $PATH, not a normal user's. So those, too, might "just seem to disappear" from the perspective of an ordinary user account.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Beginner's question. Jane <J@home.com> - 2021-08-07 09:09 +1000
Re: Beginner's question. "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-08-06 20:31 -0400
Re: Beginner's question. Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-08-08 06:11 -0400
Re: Beginner's question. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-10 06:33 +0100
Re: Beginner's question. Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2021-08-11 17:19 +1000
Re: Beginner's question. Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-09-07 07:36 -0400
Re: Beginner's question. Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2021-09-08 22:54 +1000
Re: Beginner's question. "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-09-08 23:54 +0200
Re: Beginner's question. Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-09-12 05:24 -0400
Re: Beginner's question. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-07 09:38 +0100
Re: Beginner's question. Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2021-08-08 17:01 +0000
Re: Beginner's question. John-Paul Stewart <jpstewart@personalprojects.net> - 2021-08-08 15:46 -0400
Re: Beginner's question. "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-08-08 22:42 +0200
Re: Beginner's question. Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2021-08-09 17:16 +0000
Re: Beginner's question. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-10 06:33 +0100
Re: Beginner's question. Jane <jane@home.com> - 2021-09-06 20:32 +1000
Re: Beginner's question. "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-09-06 12:46 +0200
Re: Beginner's question. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-06 12:33 +0100
Re: Beginner's question. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-06 12:31 +0100
Re: Beginner's question. Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-09-07 07:34 -0400
csiph-web