Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #552416
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: The Navy Is Gay |
| Date | 2016-02-12 01:01 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ifnvoc-poi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <8cd1550e-5477-4800-a745-f95f1bb7a749@googlegroups.com> <SQ4vy.7621$Op4.5469@fx08.iad> <sp2voc-ckg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <HH9vy.31240$OT2.10433@fx39.iad> |
benj <none@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/11/2016 02:08 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <none@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The Navy is special because during the implementation of a police state >>> they are the only service (Marines are navy) that can legally be used >>> against citizens in the US. >> >> No, the Marines are not Navy. >> >> Being a small service the Marines use the Navy for much of their logistical >> support just as the Army uses the Air Force to a lesser degree. > > They both have representatives on the Joint Chiefs and today, the Marine > Corps is considered a distinct branch of the military. The civilian > oversight of it is provided by the Department of the Navy. The > Department of the Navy and the Navy are not one and the same. Certain > equipment used by the Marine Corps does, in fact, come from the Navy. But... > > The key item here being if the Posse Comitatus law accepts the > Department of the Navy as being the exempt "navy" in the law. > >> If by "implementation of a police state" you mean martial law, it would >> mostly be done by the Army National Guard after being federalized. > > By Police state I'm not referring to marital law which normally implies > a total breakdown of civilian rule. I'm referring to the use of the > standing military forces for policing of civilians. Under the Posse > Comitatus act (1878) the navy was exempted because presumably naval > ships would have no credible role in civilian enforcement. The Air Force > was added to the act (1956) it does not apply to the coast Guard > presumably because of the same reasons as the Navy plus the fact that > the Coast Guard is a government agency as well as a service. > > So that leaves the question of the Marines open. Can marines be used to > police Detroit? > > Note that the courts have determined that the national guard is really > just a "reserve unit" of the standing army that can be loaned to > governors to use in case of emergencies etc. However governors have NO > final say. There is no "federalization" it's ALWAYS under the Army. Just > ask the Ohio Governor who brought the case to court! This is why in Ohio > we REALLY DO have a state militia! It's called the OHMR (Ohio Military > Reserve") and is volunteer and under state not Army control as any state > militia (until called up by Congress). Such a military does not fall > under Posse Comitatus. > > So clearly if one sees National Guard troops policing cities and they > have NOT been turned over to the state governors for command (as you > call it "federalized") then without martial law that is a clear > violation of the law preventing the use of military (army) for civilian > policing. IN fact, Marines policing cities may be more legal than using > the Guard (which is a reserve unit of the army) depending upon how > courts would interpret the role of "Department of the Navy". > Your understanding of how the military works is a jumble of misconceptions and errors. The National Guard is under the control of the applicable state governor until federalized, which means the active service (FYI there is more than the Army National Guard) issues orders putting the National Guard units and/or members on active duty. The National Guard is not a "reserve unit of the army (sic)", the reserve units of the Army belong to the Army Reserve. I'm not going to even bother with all the rest of your errors. Note signature. -- Jim Pennino USAR - Ret
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Navy Is Gay HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 07:46 -0800
Re: The Navy Is Gay benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 13:57 -0500
Re: The Navy Is Gay jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-11 19:08 +0000
Re: The Navy Is Gay HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 11:30 -0800
Re: The Navy Is Gay benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 20:12 -0500
Re: The Navy Is Gay jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-12 01:49 +0000
Re: The Navy Is Gay benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 23:15 -0500
Re: The Navy Is Gay jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-12 05:49 +0000
Re: The Navy Is Gay jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-02-12 13:54 +0000
Re: The Navy Is Gay HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 10:57 -0800
Re: The Navy Is Gay benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 19:29 -0500
Re: The Navy Is Gay jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-12 01:01 +0000
Re: The Navy Is Gay benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 22:50 -0500
Re: The Navy Is Gay jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-12 05:57 +0000
Re: The Navy Is Gay HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 01:35 -0800
Re: The Navy Is Gay benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 14:24 -0500
Re: The Navy Is Gay jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-12 19:43 +0000
Re: The Navy Is Gay HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 13:52 -0800
Re: The Navy Is Gay benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 00:55 -0500
csiph-web