Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #362044

Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox

Subject	Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
References	(15 earlier) <55D4E42C.7030907@PointedEars.de> <MNKdne6OfoEXiUjInZ2dnUU7_8ydnZ2d@giganews.com> <31752f7e-9265-4e33-afa2-970a3a73ebc0@googlegroups.com> <o8KdnQs8_qHFo0LInZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com> <c02d19b5-3715-4068-9659-01e686d854c3@googlegroups.com>
From	Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net>
Date	2015-08-27 22:15 -0500
Message-ID	<if-dna9HDtP6T0LInZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/27/15 8/27/15   5:24 PM, alsor@interia.pl wrote:
> You are a Christoffel symbol itself, idiot...

You merely display yourself to be the idiot. It is QUITE CLEAR that you do not 
know what a Christoffel symbol actually is. Your bluster and insults cannot hide 
that fact.

> BTW. What is the Christoffel symbol?
> You don't know that... I bet 1000000$ !

You lose!

There are two types of Christoffel symbols, known as the first kind and the 
second kind. They apply to the geometry of a manifold in specified coordinates: 
the second kind is just the affine connection compatible with the metric, while 
the first kind is just the second kind with an index lowered using the metric 
components (this makes some of its symmetry properties more obvious, and is also 
the one Christoffel found first).

It's remarkable how idiotic you behave -- the answer to your question is 
available easily on the internet. And your silly bet merely displays how 
out-of-touch you are -- I answered without referencing the internet or any book, 
as this is part of my general knowledge about physics and math.

	Send your $1,000,000 to the American Cancer Society
	https://donate.cancer.org/index

Tom Roberts

Thread

Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-09 22:24 +0200
  Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 17:59 -0700
    Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-10 18:24 +0000
      Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 11:33 -0700
        Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-19 22:16 +0200
          Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-19 18:43 -0500
            Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:52 -0500
            Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 00:01 -0700
              Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 00:05 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 00:29 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 11:16 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 22:36 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 23:06 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 00:19 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 10:54 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-26 20:32 +0200
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 15:58 -0700
              Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-27 11:44 -0500
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-27 15:24 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-27 22:15 -0500
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 23:49 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 07:19 -0500
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-28 09:55 -0500
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 16:52 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-28 20:49 -0400
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 21:45 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-09-07 11:13 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 12:21 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-07 19:36 +0000
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-09-07 12:38 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 15:49 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 20:45 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 02:15 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 10:10 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 11:35 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 12:46 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 13:15 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-09-08 22:47 +0200
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 15:09 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 15:11 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-09-08 10:17 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 11:25 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-09-08 13:18 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 13:30 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-09-08 15:34 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 18:22 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-09-09 10:25 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-09-09 10:54 -0700
                Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-09-09 12:40 -0700
          Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 22:24 -0700
            Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-21 02:44 -0400
            Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 23:58 -0700
            Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-21 08:14 -0700
    Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-19 22:10 +0200
  Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-11 18:19 +0000

csiph-web