Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > rec.games.video.arcade > #2264

Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand

From Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au>
Newsgroups rec.games.video.arcade, sci.electronics.repair
Subject Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand
Date 2021-01-13 12:48 +1100
Message-ID <i671raFikeqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <MPG.3a681b7ecdb6b617989682@news.eternal-september.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 13/01/2021 7:48 am, Rayner Lucas wrote:
> Hi all. This post is a review of the cheap "green stick" CRT degaussing
> wands, as I haven't found much discussion of them and some other
> repairers of vintage monitors may find it useful.
> 
> CRT degaussing tools seem to be hard to find these days. Occasional used
> ones come up for sale, and there are still some to be found in the US.
> However, in the UK they're near-unobtainable. The main source seems to
> be eBay sellers in China, all of whom are selling the same type: a wand-
> style degausser in a green plastic shell. So, having a couple of CRTs
> with purity problems, I bought one to see if it would do any good.
> 
> The wand cost about 15 GBP and arrived within a couple of weeks. There
> was no documentation included, leaving me with just the specs given in
> the eBay listing, which read:
> -Relative magnetic field: 70MT
> -Load current: 1A
> -Working hours: 20 seconds
> -Power: 220V
> -Specifications: About 31*31*200(mm)
> 
> The outer shell is some soft semi-translucent plastic (polythene?), and
> feels extremely cheap. A momentary switch pokes out of the top of the
> casing (a momentary switch is good, as it stops me accidentally leaving
> the coil energised).
> 
> The wand came with a moulded two-prong plug, which I had to cut off to
> fit a UK plug. And... I have never seen mains cable that thin before. It
> is, at least, double insulated, but the conductors are at most 28AWG and
> possibly even thinner (it's hard to measure stranded cable, but the
> diameter is somewhere around 0.25mm to 0.35mm). The strain relief clamp
> in the UK plug wouldn't even hold the cable until I wrapped some extra
> plastic around it. Oof. Looking at the ampacity ratings on the Wikipedia
> article for American Wire Gauge, that cable must be very close to, if
> not exceeding, its recommended current rating. It feels worryingly
> plausible that someone, somewhere made the calculation "it's fine, if
> they push the button for too long the coil will burn out before the
> cable insulation melts".
> 
> However, the tool does what it's supposed to and noticeably reduced the
> blotches visible on the CRT display. I used the standard technique of
> powering the coil from a couple of metres away, bringing it up to the
> CRT face, circling it around a couple of times, then smoothly backing
> away two or three metres before switching off again. I definitely
> recommend sticking to the stated maximum of 20 seconds continuous
> operation and letting the wand cool fully before using it again. The
> heat seems to take a few seconds to conduct to the outside of the
> casing, so it's not until after you've switched it off that you feel how
> warm it's really getting.
> 
> I popped the end cap off the casing to take a look inside, but haven't
> disassembled it further. Strain relief is just a knot in the mains
> cable. I don't see any current limiting apart from the coil itself. The
> coil is wrapped around a core of steel plates, and seems to have some
> more plastic insulation around it. The non-business end of the coil
> seems to have some copper mesh shielding. Hooking the whole thing up to
> a component tester, coil resistance measures around 140 ohms, with an
> inductance of 320mH.
> 
> In summary,
> 
> Pros:
> - Cheap.
> - Does what it's supposed to.
> 
> Cons:
> - Not particularly sturdy.
> - Probably not the safest thing ever, use with caution.
> 
> If there were better-quality tools available, I would definitely buy
> those instead. But there weren't, and this one did at least provide the
> functionality I needed.
> 
> HTH,
> Rayner
> 

**I have always been an audio tech. I have always avoided TV work where 
possible. However, back in the day, I would frequently perform a CRT 
degauss, using my Han-D-Mag head demagnetiser. I found that it could 
deal with any degaussing requirement.

https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Tape-head-demagnetiser-demagnetizer-Han-D-Mag-220-240V-/271234117484

Geez, they're expensive nowadays. I still have mine.

-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Back to rec.games.video.arcade | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand Rayner Lucas <usenet202101@magic-cookie.co.ukNOSPAMPLEASE> - 2021-01-12 20:48 +0000
  Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2021-01-12 14:00 -0800
    Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand Ralph Mowery <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> - 2021-01-12 17:27 -0500
      Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand Rayner Lucas <usenet202101@magic-cookie.co.ukNOSPAMPLEASE> - 2021-01-13 00:56 +0000
        Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2021-01-12 22:47 -0800
          Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand Rayner Lucas <usenet202101@magic-cookie.co.ukNOSPAMPLEASE> - 2021-01-13 08:05 +0000
  Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2021-01-13 12:48 +1100
    Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2021-01-12 22:50 -0800
      Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2021-01-13 19:21 +1100
  Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2021-01-17 18:26 +0000
  Re: Reviewing a cheap CRT degaussing wand Mike Garcia <mike@mgarcia.nospam> - 2021-01-22 07:14 +0000

csiph-web