Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD.

From	"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD.
Date	2015-08-11 15:59 -0500
Message-ID	<hp6dnSWRO-Db_1fInZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

If a jet fuel collapse can leave less of a building standing than a 
Controlled Demolition then why don't they just use jet fuel to bring down 
very tall skyscrapers instead of deep underground nukes?

The truth is 9/11 was one great big hoax where not only were CGIs used in 
Nuke York City with what they used to synchronize the real world with the 
bogus world clearly visible but they also had bogus blips on the radar 
screens and that is proven by the fact the fighters they sent after Flight 
77 followed one of the bogus blips out over the Ocean instead of to the 
Pentagon.

The fact remains the debris pile left by the Twin Towers was well below the 
height of the Surviving Corners which is way too small to be from a COLLAPSE 
or a "Controlled Demolition" so that only leaves an NCD.

Rocky

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-11 15:59 -0500
  Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-11 22:38 +0000
    Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:47 -0500
      Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 22:41 +0000
        Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:05 -0500
          Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:36 -0500
            Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:10 -0500
      Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-14 16:41 +0100
        Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:10 -0500
        Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:47 +0100
  Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:19 -0500
    Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 17:02 -0500
      Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
  Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-14 16:38 +0100
    Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:49 -0500
      Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-14 17:13 +0100
        Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 09:21 +0100
          Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:49 +0100
            Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 20:34 +0100
    Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:48 +0100
      Re: Needed info on a COLLAPSE vs CD vs NCD. Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:29 +0100

csiph-web