Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #266752
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? |
| Date | 2014-11-10 04:43 +0000 |
| Organization | ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand |
| Message-ID | <h99kgue.ty33@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <cb4c04ea-d40e-4e83-b512-72d766cd4984@googlegroups.com> <hg9e.fjeop@rooftop.invalid> <a941fb39-832e-4daa-8dca-ce85c00fd571@googlegroups.com> <bghv9.afeap3@rooftop.invalid> <D0858D0C.410A2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/9/14, 6:50 PM, in article bghv9.afeap3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sunday, November 9, 2014 11:09:04 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: >>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, November 9, 2014 9:57:01 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 11/9/14, 9:31 AM, in article m3o4sd$hrh$1@dont-email.me, "DFS" >>>>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> When the median would be much more useful and revealing? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm 100% sure they do it to make Linux and its proponents look better. >>>>>>> But it hides the effects of the large donations made by a few Linux >>>>>>> people. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.humblebundle.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Numbers (around 10:40am today) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Total payments: $1,110,293.65 >>>>>>> Number of purchases: 149,494 >>>>>>> Average purchase: $7.43 >>>>>>> Average Windows: $7.08 >>>>>>> Average Mac: $8.55 >>>>>>> Average Linux: $10.06 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The avg Linux purchase is 42% higher than the avg Windows purchase. The >>>>>>> reason is because Windows gamers buy good games at $30 to $60 a pop, and >>>>>>> don't have as much to spend on these crapola games - which are top >>>>>>> flight games for deprived Linux victims. >>>>>> >>>>>> This was discussed in some detail a while back with a previous bundle. It >>>>>> was amazing how many in COLA could not understand the basic math / stats. >>>>>> cc >>>>>> was absolutely hilarious in his ignorance about it. >>>> >>>>> As hilarious as this? >>>> >>>>> "...by definition a set MUST contain all of the features of a subset, >>>>> otherwise it (the subset) wouldn't be a subset." >>>> >>>>> Your reply: >>>> >>>>> "Items in a set need not contain all the items in any given subset within >>>>> that set." >>>> >>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/sN1HvpwXrK >>>>> w/7nrGK5fKuwIJ >>>> >>>>> I don't think so ;) >>>> >>>> The set "balls" does not contain all of the features of its subset >>>> "red balls." >> >>> Which has nothing to do with what you responded to. >> >> I responded at the end, but my response was more directed to your >> "quoted" paraphrase of the statement at the link, which has something to >> do with incest as a subset of sex. The claim, which Snit disagreed with, >> implied that a set must contain all the features of any of its subsets. >> That claim is false, so Snit was correct to object. Although he did >> incorrectly use the term "items" instead of "features" in his objection, >> that likely *typo* does not make the original claim true any more true. >> That it was a typo is obvious from his entire statement, where he >> goes on to reference "features," not "items": >> >> <quote> >> Items in a set need not contain all the items in any given subset within >> that set. Even though incest is sex, not all "sex MUST include all of the >> features of incest." >> </quote> >> > Exactly right. I used an incorrect word in one of the stupid endless debates > that happen in COLA and CSMA. Instead of focusing on the facts, Carroll > nit-picks and plays stupid games. I openly admit the *one* sentence Carroll > quoted was worded incorrectly... but by the context any reasonable person > can see my point was correct. > Carroll, on the other hand, defends Tim Adam's incorrect (and repulsive) > claim that all sex must include all the features of incest... and did the > same when Tim Adams insisted that sex and incest are, in his view, > "identical" and "synonymous". Unlike Carroll, I assumed Tim Adams just > misspoke and granted him that... refusing to sink to the games they used to > play (and Carroll *still* is, years later!) > In brief: Carroll claims I refuse to let go of things, assume the worst in > people, twist words, etc. His example here, though, is a great example where > I actively did not do that and granted that people make mistakes in their > typing and Carroll and his co-trolls did as he accuses and he continues to > for years. > Carroll is a completely hypocritical, obsessive jerk who will play these > games as long as he can. He is not capable of having a reasonable discussion > when he has a chance to mindlessly and dishonestly attack me. He's a madman.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-09 11:31 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 09:56 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? charlescroyden3@gmail.com - 2014-11-09 09:13 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:18 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 09:25 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-09 12:39 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:50 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? charlescroyden3@gmail.com - 2014-11-09 09:52 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:58 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Jorge Dimaggio <jorgedimaggio@spammenot.org> - 2014-11-09 13:34 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-09 15:32 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 13:37 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-10 08:09 -0600
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-10 09:15 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-11 09:24 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-11 10:21 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-11 16:45 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-11-09 11:55 -0600
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 10:58 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-10 10:35 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-11-09 11:08 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 12:22 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-09 14:42 -0600
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-09 19:22 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-10 06:33 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-10 10:47 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-10 11:07 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-10 19:40 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-10 19:33 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-10 20:09 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-11 08:55 -0500
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 09:15 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-09 18:09 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 11:57 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 10:54 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 01:50 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 19:45 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 04:35 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:02 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 05:28 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 22:37 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 22:25 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:39 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 22:19 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:25 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 21:28 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 04:43 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:09 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2014-11-10 05:34 +0000
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-10 07:37 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-10 08:26 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-09 22:18 -0700
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 21:23 -0800
Re: Why do the "Humble Bundle" people use the mean purchase per platform? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-09 20:54 -0800
csiph-web