Re: Project review

From	Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: Project review
Date	2019-09-13 15:31 +1200
Message-ID	<gu0gshF9rkjU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <77150ef7-89cc-497d-ae94-3dc3835087cf@googlegroups.com> <b39a460b-a199-4986-b398-32fe3f0a121c@googlegroups.com> <hWueF.220633$OU6.166322@fx40.iad> <7456e873-4385-4da9-b27d-a8882cffbb8a@googlegroups.com> <7wxeF.391453$AR4.287684@fx39.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

On 13/09/2019 08:03, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> woodbrian77@gmail.com writes:
>> On Thursday, September 12, 2019 at 12:06:32 PM UTC-5, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>> woodbrian77@gmail.com writes:
>>>> On Thursday, September 12, 2019 at 1:10:32 AM UTC-5, =C3=96=C3=B6 Tiib wrot=
>>>
>>>> I built my software yesterday on Linux 5 with Gcc 9.2 for=20
>>>> the first time.  This combo produced the smallest versions=20
>>>> of my executables to date.
>>>
>>> Executable size is a useless metric.  Why do you think it is
>>> either useful or interesting?
>>
>> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=mark+cppnow+vmware&t=h_&ia=videos&iax=videos&iai=vGV5u1nxqd8
> 
> If you can't explain it in your own words, fine.  I've no interest
> in watching some random video
The video is interesting and probably (it's a presentation by Mark Zeren 
from VmWare) relevant to your work.  He does make a strong case for 
measuring executable size as a measure of code complexity.  Saying that, 
it has no relevance to comparative compiler code sizes...

-- 
Ian.

Thread

Project review woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-09-10 20:00 -0700
  Re: Project review Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-09-10 23:38 -0700
    Re: Project review woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-09-11 19:44 -0700
      Re: Project review Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-09-11 23:10 -0700
        Re: Project review woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-09-12 09:36 -0700
          Re: Project review scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2019-09-12 17:06 +0000
            Re: Project review woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-09-12 10:53 -0700
              Re: Project review scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2019-09-12 20:03 +0000
                Re: Project review "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2019-09-12 16:14 -0400
                Re: Project review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-09-13 15:31 +1200
                Re: Project review David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-09-13 09:29 +0200
                Re: Project review Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-09-13 19:45 +1200
                Re: Project review David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-09-13 10:22 +0200
                Re: Project review scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2019-09-13 13:07 +0000
                Re: Project review David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-09-13 15:30 +0200
                Re: Project review Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.removethisbit.co.uk> - 2019-09-13 14:18 +0100
                Re: Project review woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-09-13 07:32 -0700
                Re: Project review David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-09-14 13:34 +0200
          Re: Project review Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2019-09-12 23:28 -0700
            Re: Project review woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-09-13 21:21 -0700
  Re: Project review Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.removethisbit.co.uk> - 2019-09-11 15:49 +0100
    Re: Project review rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2019-09-11 08:08 -0700
      Re: Project review Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.removethisbit.co.uk> - 2019-09-11 17:17 +0100
  Re: Project review Szyk Cech <szykcech@spoko.pl> - 2019-09-12 20:22 +0200
    Re: Project review Szyk Cech <szykcech@spoko.pl> - 2019-09-12 20:24 +0200
    Re: Project review woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-09-12 17:53 -0700

csiph-web