Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.radio.amateur > #343852
| From | Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.radio.amateur, uk.net.news.management, uk.d-i-y, uk.local.glasgow |
| Subject | Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m |
| Date | 2019-08-20 06:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gs1j0kF8a2nU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <gs07k5Fu3ctU2@mid.individual.net> <qjepnp$73l$1@dont-email.me> <%%B6F.32132$Zy3.24596@usenetxs.com> <X12oBaSiXvWdFwul@brattleho.plus.com> <3505FdSfP5WdFwK9@b-howie.co.uk> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> wrote: > In message <X12oBaSiXvWdFwul@brattleho.plus.com>, Ian Jackson > <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> writes >> In message <%%B6F.32132$Zy3.24596@usenetxs.com>, Roger Breedle >> <rb@rmb.invalid> writes >>> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:27:22 +0100 >>> "NY" <me@privacy.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> "Stephen Cole" <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> wrote in message >>>> news:gs07k5Fu3ctU2@mid.individual.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ian, you jokingly mentioned the problem with 70cms was it >>>>>>>>>>>>> was 159.3m >>>>>>>>>>>>> too short and that got me thinking about 160m. I've never >>>>>>>>>>>>> had a 160m >>>>>>>>>>>>> QSO in 29 years of activity. I've never been motivated to >>>>>>>>>>>>> try the band. So what makes 160m something of interest to >>>>>>>>>>>>> you after you've been active for 60 years or so? >>>> >>>> As a matter of interest, why do radio amateurs still refer to >>>> wavelength, when broadcast radio changed to referring to frequency in >>>> the 1970s-80s? I realise that c = f lambda, so one is related to the >>>> other by a factor of c. >>>> >>>> Do modern ham radios with synthesised tuning and digital displays >>>> actually display it as a wavelength in metres/centimetres, or do they >>>> display frequencies in kHz/MHz, but colloquially referred to as "in >>>> the 70 cm / 160 m band" as an approximation. >>>> >>> >>> Why aren't the wavelengths in yards? >> >> We will be changing back to yards in 1 Nov. > > Lord Kelvin of Glasgow University was the champion of the metric system. > The absolute metric temperature scale is named after him. > > By a remarkable coincidence ,the non metric equivalent the Rankine > scale is named after a contemporary of his at Glasgow William Rankine. > > Http://www.engineeringhalloffame.org/profile-rankine.html > > A proper Polymath and champion of the non-metric system. > > "Two of Rankine's somewhat reactionary verses from "The Three Foot Rule" > which he sang at the British Association in 1864" Listed on the right > > He was some kid. Did he ever get a postman in a headlock, tho? -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur
Back to uk.radio.amateur | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ping Ian Jackson 160m mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2019-08-17 15:58 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Peter Able <stuck@home.com> - 2019-08-17 15:32 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-17 17:05 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Graham. <graham-usenet@mail.com> - 2019-08-17 18:09 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Peter Able <stuck@home.com> - 2019-08-17 17:46 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 20:00 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> - 2019-08-18 08:28 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 19:59 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Graham. <graham-usenet@mail.com> - 2019-08-17 21:14 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 21:16 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-17 21:58 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-18 11:36 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> - 2019-08-18 08:28 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-18 08:56 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 19:57 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2019-08-19 18:06 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 18:25 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 18:31 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 18:05 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 18:20 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 19:25 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Rambo <Rambo@thisaintreal.org> - 2019-08-19 19:52 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 20:23 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "NY" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2019-08-19 19:27 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 19:29 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "NY" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2019-08-19 21:20 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 21:27 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Roger Breedle <rb@rmb.invalid> - 2019-08-19 19:37 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 18:43 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Jim <jim@jim.jim.jim.invalid> - 2019-08-19 19:54 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 20:29 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 20:28 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 19:35 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 20:37 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Brian Reay <no.sp@m.com> - 2019-08-20 06:40 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-20 07:56 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m roger@hayter.org (Roger Hayter) - 2019-08-20 09:41 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-20 10:46 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m roger@hayter.org (Roger Hayter) - 2019-08-20 11:03 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Jeefaw K Effkay <mike.gathergood@googlemail.com> - 2019-08-20 05:17 -0700
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-20 14:50 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Jeefaw K Effkay <mike.gathergood@googlemail.com> - 2019-08-20 07:56 -0700
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-20 18:18 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Jeff <jeff@ukra.com> - 2019-08-21 09:43 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-21 11:48 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-19 20:17 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> - 2019-08-20 07:31 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-20 06:41 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 20:27 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-19 21:48 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Jeefaw K Effkay <mike.gathergood@googlemail.com> - 2019-08-19 15:19 -0700
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-08-19 20:49 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2019-08-20 11:07 +1000
Re: Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2019-08-20 10:30 +0200
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Rambo <Rambo@thisaintreal.org> - 2019-08-19 19:55 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 19:13 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Bernie <bernie.usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-08-19 22:19 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-20 07:58 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 18:05 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-19 21:44 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Peter Able <stuck@home.com> - 2019-08-21 18:52 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-21 20:40 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2019-08-21 21:41 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-21 21:46 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Rambo <Rambo@thisaintreal.org> - 2019-08-21 23:12 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Bernie <bernie.usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-08-21 23:40 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-22 06:25 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Brian Reay <no.sp@m.com> - 2019-08-22 06:45 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2019-08-22 09:33 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> - 2019-08-22 08:00 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-22 10:19 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> - 2019-08-17 17:46 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Graham. <graham-usenet@mail.com> - 2019-08-17 20:53 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> - 2019-08-17 20:41 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> - 2019-08-18 08:30 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2019-08-18 11:18 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-18 11:37 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> - 2019-08-18 20:06 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-18 20:59 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> - 2019-08-19 08:23 +0000
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2019-08-19 10:28 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 20:02 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 20:15 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-17 20:56 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 21:17 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-17 22:00 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 22:12 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 22:14 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 22:28 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-17 23:02 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-18 07:31 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-18 07:32 +0100
Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <jim.gm4dhj@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-18 12:00 +0100
csiph-web