Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usage.english > #1146783
| Subject | Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.usage.english |
| References | <nbbjhtFdmvsU1@mid.individual.net> <1ry120o.16vggjwn26chyN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <nbe8thFqf4aU1@mid.individual.net> <1ry5mvd.t1uea712co5hyN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| From | Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> |
| Message-ID | <grV4S.447$wGd3.157@fx15.ams1> (permalink) |
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Date | 2026-07-13 00:29 +0100 |
On 12/07/2026 22:09, J. J. Lodder wrote: > occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote: > >> On 10/07/2026 13:14, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>> occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote: >>> >>>> Apparently there is great excitement at the British Museum today >>>> (according to the BBC). They are taking delivery of the Bayeux tapestry >>>> on loan from France. >>>> >>>> One or two people have pointed out that technically it is an embroidery >>>> and not a tapestry. (We are all agreed that it is no a cross-stitch.) >>>> >>>> Its claim to fame is age - nearly a 1000 years old - and not historical >>>> accuracy. The most interesting controversy (for me) is the dispute >>>> regarding the penis count. >>> >>> Accuracy? That was never the idea. >>> It is a shameless piece of Norman propaganda, >>> >> >> So what? It was the tabloid of its day, with fake news. > > In those long ago and backward times people came to see the tabloid, > instead of having tabloids delivered to them, But how many people would have the opportunity to see the 'tapestry' - fake news or not? Certainly none of the common folk - but they didn't count for anything. -- Sam Plusnet
Back to alt.usage.english | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Tapestry or embroidery ? occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-10 08:59 +0200
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-10 13:14 +0200
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-11 09:16 +0200
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-11 08:59 +0100
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-11 11:13 +0200
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-07-12 18:22 +0100
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> - 2026-07-12 15:47 -0400
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-12 23:09 +0200
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-13 00:29 +0100
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-10 21:10 +0100
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-10 23:32 +0200
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-11 09:41 +1000
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-11 02:06 +0100
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-07-12 18:24 +0100
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-11 08:48 +0100
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-11 11:27 +0200
Re: Tapestry or embroidery ? Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-11 17:41 +0100
csiph-web