Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #12646
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine |
| Date | 2012-03-13 09:03 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <glrul7d7miu4dn444avgi9stbqa996lt7i@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <7577204.4705.1331535049931.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynnk21> <2455587.J1nglo7zMT@PointedEars.de> <2UVL3KD5nyXPFw5i@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> |
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:05:29 +0000, John G Harris
<john@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 at 00:03:13, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas
>'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>
> <snip>
>>There is no "javascript", that is a common misconception.
> <snip>
>
>Is there anyone else who agrees with Thomas ?
Tom de Neef apparently does. Here is a post of mine from
2011-12-01 in reply to him regarding Mr. Lahn:
***** Start of Quoted Post *****
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:34:13 +0100, "Tom de Neef" <tdeneef@qolor.nl>
wrote:
>"Gene Wirchenko" <genew@ocis.net>
>>
>> Since his posts do not appear useful, ...
>
>You must have misread. There was quite some useful info right from the
>start.
>I suggest you focus on content rather than style.
No, I prefer to focus on style. That way I get to know who posts
in a readable, helpful style. Of those, it is almost certain that
some will post correct information. Because their style is readable,
it is easier to determine usefulness and correctness.
Or I could try deciphering posts written by people who are
antagonistic or have axes to grind.
No, I think I will continue with the first way.
Thank you to all of you who have posted helpfully. I like your
style!
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
***** End of Quoted Post *****
I still appreciate helpful posters, and I still have Mr. Lahn in
my killfile.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine R Hall <richkhall@gmail.com> - 2012-03-11 23:50 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-03-12 07:59 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-03-13 00:03 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 11:05 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-03-13 12:37 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-14 16:24 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-03-16 01:55 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 09:03 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 10:53 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 12:36 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 19:07 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 22:43 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 06:09 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-16 12:53 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 13:30 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-16 15:42 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 17:32 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 14:04 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-03-16 01:40 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-15 14:20 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-16 17:28 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-16 10:53 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 17:00 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-03-17 12:05 +0100
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-17 10:24 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Matt McDonald <matt@fortybelow.ca> - 2012-03-16 19:39 -0600
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-16 18:54 -0700
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-17 16:53 +0000
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine Matt McDonald <matt@fortybelow.ca> - 2012-03-17 13:10 -0600
Re: Javascript directly calling the Google App Engine John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-18 13:06 +0000
csiph-web