Groups > comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html > #6797

ECMAScript (was: Re: responsive navigator)

From	Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups	comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, alt.html, comp.lang.javascript
Subject	ECMAScript (was: Re: responsive navigator)
Followup-To	comp.lang.javascript
Date	2019-06-05 13:58 +0200
Message-ID	<glpp3hF2toU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<c0h8lt.s43.17.1@news.alt.net> <4459082.GXAFRqVoOG@PointedEars.de> <slrnqepdk8.i8k.g.kreme@Snow.local> <2482631.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> <slrnqf5vge.nlq.g.kreme@Snow.local>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript

Show all headers | View raw

On 02.06.19 00:37, Lewis wrote:

> In message <2482631.mvXUDI8C0e@PointedEars.de> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote:
[...]
>> You need to read more carefully.  Writing “javascript” is NOT just about 
>> spelling, it is indicative of a deeper misconception.
> 
> No, it's a stupid pedant being a stupid pedant.

If you don't want to learn about the facts, then just shut up and don't
call others "stupid pedant"!

ECMAScript is the one and only standard and JavaScript, V8, JScript etc.
are just implementations based on that standard.

And those implementations also rely on a runtime environmnet which as
*nothing* to do with a *language*. For example Node.js provides a
completely different set of objects as Firefox or Chrome.

>> F’up2 comp.lang.javascript
> 
> No.

Well it doesn't surprise me, that you don't want to follow up to the
right newsgroup. But I'd recommend going there if you really want to
discuss and learn and not just call everybody a "stupid pedant" because
they know more about the topic than you. Otherwise just ignore this post.

F'Up to comp.lang.javascript.

-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de

Thread

responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-20 17:08 -0500
  Re: responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-20 19:34 -0500
  Re: responsive navigator Osmo Saarikumpu <osmo@weppipakki.com> - 2019-02-21 18:44 +0200
    Re: responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-21 12:35 -0500
    Re: responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-21 15:33 -0500
      Re: responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-21 18:45 -0500
        Re: responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-21 20:32 -0500
          Re: responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-22 09:06 -0500
          Re: responsive navigator Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-02-22 14:24 +0000
            Re: responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-22 12:33 -0500
      Re: responsive navigator Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-02-22 01:51 +0000
        Re: responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-21 21:25 -0500
          Re: responsive navigator Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-06-06 09:09 +0200
  Re: responsive navigator dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-28 16:46 -0500
  Re: responsive navigator Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-05-27 22:04 +0200
    Re: responsive navigator Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-05-28 04:18 +0000
      Re: responsive navigator Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-06-01 13:06 +0200
        Re: responsive navigator Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-06-01 22:37 +0000
          ECMAScript (was: Re: responsive navigator) Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-06-05 13:58 +0200
            Re: ECMAScript (was: Re: responsive navigator) Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-06-05 20:20 +0000
      Re: responsive navigator Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2019-06-05 13:51 +0200
    Re: responsive navigator Ed Mullen <ej@edmullen.net> - 2019-06-01 11:51 -0400
      Re: responsive navigator Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2019-06-01 18:00 +0200

csiph-web