Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #349523
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking |
| Date | 2016-04-12 15:43 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <ghjdi03ra.g@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <5fa641ac-86dc-412f-b15a-6b13fe48ef79@googlegroups.com> <neglda$u2t$1@dont-email.me> <f8af6e4a-5299-4a02-8b6b-7b2b41f37ae0@googlegroups.com> <negpr7$g33$1@dont-email.me> <f40b2cad-885f-45b2-9f3a-d0f49e31c6ee@googlegroups.com> |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Monday, April 11, 2016 at 2:22:41 PM UTC-4, DFS wrote: >> On 4/11/2016 2:20 PM, -hh wrote: >> > Omar wrote: >> >> -hh wrote: >> >>>> [...] >> >>> >> >>> All they're doing is re-affirming that they've lost once again, >> >>> and just how thoroughly they remain pwned. >> >>> >> >>> Here, the boys are trying to use how the article didn't bother >> >>> to explicitly note that Nest is a Linux company to try to claim >> >>> that they're not: that's the logical flaw known as "Argument >> >>> from Ignorance": >> >>> >> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance#Absence_of_evidence> >> >>> >> >>> Since it has already been determined from other sources that >> >>> Nest is a Linux company, each time that they whine like this >> >>> just gives the readership audience a good deep laugh at their >> >>> expense, as they so dearly try to cling to remaining ignorant. >> >> >> >> Logic and Linux losers used in the same sentence is an oxymoron. >> >> ... >> >> >> >> These so called Linux advocates are mentally ill. >> >> They really are. >> > >> > It is more that they wear their "envy of success" on their sleeve, >> > and try to blame others for their own personal shortcomings in life. >> >> >> chrisv Feb 2013 >> >> "it is impossible to become a billionaire while competing >> fairly with others. No one is that fscking great. Some unfair >> advantage(s) must be obtained." > > Obviously, chrisv considers intelligence and being a hard worker to > both be "unfair advantages". > >> > For example, one of my car pics here it will invariably attract some >> > lame put-down attempts, but the irony is that their "Debbie Downer" >> > routine is but a mirror into their own ugliness. Case in point: >> > >> > <http://www.huntzinger.com/gallery/index.php/Cars/Parking_1299> >> >> >> Macan? > > If I say yes, I'll then be expected to also disclose if its the S, GTS, or Turbo... > ...so let's just instead say that its a misbadged Ford Focus ;-) > Here's what you need. If you're going ugly, you might as well go all the way... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mFmk5uwiA0
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Another Linux company - - product bricking -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-04 19:29 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 09:28 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-05 07:29 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 10:33 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-05 10:58 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 11:33 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-05 08:21 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 11:38 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Evilheart <up@yourfat.ass> - 2016-04-05 18:29 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-06 03:33 -0700
re: Another Linux company - - product bricking "1 eyed chicken" <chicken@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 20:54 +0200
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-06 15:26 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-06 14:15 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-06 17:37 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking "Henry" <henry@alpha.org> - 2016-04-08 13:53 +0200
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 18:59 +0100
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-08 11:14 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-08 14:48 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 15:23 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-08 13:46 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-11 07:18 -0500
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-11 13:33 +0100
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-11 09:49 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-11 10:43 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-11 09:59 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-11 13:06 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-11 11:20 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-11 14:22 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-12 04:58 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 05:51 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-12 15:43 +0000
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-12 13:48 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-12 12:36 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Silver Slimer <fat.linux.loser@linux.is.sh.it> - 2016-04-11 19:31 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-08 13:14 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-08 13:54 -0700
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-08 20:14 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 20:22 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-10 01:28 +0100
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-09 20:33 -0400
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-12 12:50 -0500
Re: Another Linux company - - product bricking JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-12 12:49 -0500
csiph-web