Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled
Date	2016-02-26 20:52 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<ggq6qc-gp9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <39d986c0-6e5e-41ca-b9de-33a37059de7a@googlegroups.com> <PJudnUVI-6drOE3LnZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com> <5ee48574-eb56-49cb-9718-5bddd2d06c9f@googlegroups.com> <PJudnUdI-6cBOk3LnZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@giganews.com> <f35b89e8-f319-458b-b433-197767ed9dd6@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 11:29:37 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> On 2/26/16 1:26 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>> > Sam, other than the one on top of your head, do you have a point?
>> 
>> 
>>    Here is my point, James:
>> 
>>    Water vapour (H2O) like Oxygen (O2) like Nitrogen (N2) is an invisible
>>    gas. There is nothing to see.
> 
> Gaseous H2O; H2O(g) = Invisible (g is for gas)
> 
> Evaporate H2O; H2O(l) = Sometimes invisible, sometimes visible * (l is for liquid)
> 
> (*) It depends on size of droplet/cluster.  The exact number isn't known,
> but generally a cluster with a diameter smaller than a photon is invisible.

The size of an individual H2O molecule is 2.75 A, therefore two H2O
molecules are about 5.5 A, or about the size of a far UV photon.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 09:35 -0800
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 10:14 -0800
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:07 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:24 -0800
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:11 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:26 -0600
        Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:38 -0800
          Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 17:02 -0600
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 18:06 +0000
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:34 -0600
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:11 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:22 -0600
        Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:26 -0800
          Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:29 -0600
            Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:00 -0800
              Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:04 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:06 -0600
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:17 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:01 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:24 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:42 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 18:33 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-27 03:52 +0000
                pull or\and push it noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 16:58 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 16:03 -0800
              Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:05 -0600
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:13 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
              Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 20:52 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:05 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:02 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:25 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:47 +0000
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-26 13:03 -0600
  is pulled by noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:46 -0800
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 09:41 -0800
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-06 11:47 -0600
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-07 19:38 +1100
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 01:01 -0800

csiph-web