Re: Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity
Date	2019-02-13 13:17 +1100
Message-ID	<gchd0tFfltqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<47fd56bd-177d-4a45-8c43-1f48d96f8b54@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/02/2019 10:02 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
> All consequences of Einstein's false constant-speed-of-light postulate are absurd, even idiotic, so Einstein's relativity can be disproved logically, through reductio ad absurdum. Here is a length contraction idiocy:
> 
> "Einstein's Relativistic Train in a Tunnel Paradox: Special Relativity"  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xrqj88zQZJg

You know very well that there are no contradictions in SR, so what's the 
point?

Sylvia.

Thread

Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-12 03:02 -0800
  Re: Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-12 07:18 -0800
    Re: Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-12 11:30 -0800
  Re: Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-13 13:17 +1100
    Re: Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity "nuny@bid.nes" <alien8752@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 10:13 -0800
    Re: Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-13 20:17 -0500
    Re: Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2019-02-13 18:18 -0800
      Re: Logical (Non-Experimental) Refutations of Einstein's relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2019-02-14 13:54 +1100

csiph-web