Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #17858

Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM)

From "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.php
Subject Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM)
Date 2018-12-26 15:41 +0100
Message-ID <g8hi7sFbu8nU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <82a7cd23-82be-4611-a691-e0edcf8c30d6@googlegroups.com> <241220181649060212%timstreater@greenbee.net> <5c212055$0$22357$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <g8grh2F7644U1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 12/26/18 9:13 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
> Luuk:
> 
> [...]
>> Back to the subject:
>> I do not think this is a bug in PHP, but a 'bug' in your application.
>> Everythin PHP has done, is done accourindg to definition.
> 
> I think it's a bug.
> 
> PHP should NOT output anything unless told so. If there are two files
> which only contain "<?php" as the very first content, there should not
> be any output at all. And even an echo statement should not output any
> BOM, just because the file itself contains it.

As long as it begins with <?php it will not output anything, but the BOM
is put before the <?php and so you will have output which is outside the
php engines control.

-- 

 //Aho

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) vfhhutt45hghjjdewrghb@gmail.com - 2018-12-24 08:39 -0800
  Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2018-12-24 16:49 +0000
    Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2018-12-24 19:07 +0100
      Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2018-12-24 20:54 +0100
        Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2018-12-24 21:15 +0100
      Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2018-12-26 09:13 +0100
        Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2018-12-26 12:41 +0100
          Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2018-12-26 15:32 +0100
        Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2018-12-26 15:41 +0100
          Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) vfhhutt45hghjjdewrghb@gmail.com - 2019-01-04 08:29 -0800
            Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-01-04 21:08 -0500
            Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-01-05 11:04 +0100
              Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2019-01-05 11:26 -0500
                Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-01-05 16:33 +0000
                Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2019-01-05 19:34 +0100
                Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-01-05 19:08 +0000
                Re: Twice UTF-8 byte-order mark (BOM) Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2019-01-06 20:25 +0100

csiph-web